All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court, District of Columbia |
2017-10 |
-
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT CoURT OCT 2 4 2017 FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA clerk. u.s. manner a aankwprcy Courts for the D|str|ct of Columb|a SURF MooRE, ) ) Plaimiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Acrion NO. 17-2035 (UNA) ) U.s. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, el al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMoRANDUM oPINIoN The Court construes the plaintiff’ s pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis While reviewing the complaint, the Court keeps in mind that pleadings filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haz``nes v. Kerner,
404 U.S. 5l9, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz``sch,
656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal,
556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claims being asserted such that they can prepare a responsive answer, prepare an adequate defense, and determine whether the doctrine of res_/'ua'icata applies. Brown v. Calzfano,
75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As drafted, this complaint fails to comply With Rule 8(a). lt does not appear to state the grounds upon which this court’s jurisdiction depends, a statement of a cognizable claim showing plaintiffs entitlement to relief, or any support for the plaintiffs demand for $ 100 million. t ,~» ~.(...»-.\.Wm~\w“.. ~ W. 1 ., The Court will grant the plaintiffs application to proceed informal pauperis, deny his motion for injunctive relief, and dismiss this civil action without prejudice An Order is issued separately. DATE; 10 )»9 111 AM;``W Unit&l States listrict Judge
Document Info
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2017-2035
Judges: Judge Amit P. Mehta
Filed Date: 10/24/2017
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/24/2017