Sanders v. District of Columbia ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    _________________________________________
    )
    CHRISTOPHER SANDERS,                      )
    )
    Plaintiff,                    )
    )
    v.                                  )                   Civil Action No. 06-1411 (PLF)
    )
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al.,             )
    )
    Defendants.                   )
    _________________________________________ )
    MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
    On October 1, 2013, the Court ordered the parties to file supplemental
    memoranda regarding the parties’ pending cross-motions for summary judgment. The parties
    filed their respective memoranda on November 12, 2013. On November 3, 2014, however,
    plaintiff filed an unsolicited “Notice of Supplemental Authority.” In addition to notifying the
    Court of recent potentially relevant court decisions, the Notice contains significant legal
    argument and appears to be more a supplemental memorandum of law than a “notice.”
    Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Local Rules of this Court
    provide for the filing of supplemental authorities. In practice, however, this Court has allowed
    notices of supplemental authority to be filed without leave of court, provided that such notices
    are limited. Cf. FED. R. APP. PRO. 28(j) (A party may file a letter “setting forth the citations” and
    “stat[ing] the reasons for the supplemental citations” in 350 words or less). But “[a] surreply
    may be filed only by leave of Court, and only to address new matters raised in a reply to which a
    party would otherwise be unable to respond.” United States ex rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment
    Ctrs. of Am., Inc., 
    238 F. Supp. 2d 270
    , 276-77 (D.D.C. 2002). Plaintiff did not request such
    leave.
    Although plaintiff has filed an impermissible surreply, the Court, in its discretion,
    will not strike plaintiff’s Notice of Supplemental Authority. Defendants instead will be given the
    opportunity to respond to plaintiff’s arguments, in a brief of similar length, to be filed on or
    before November 21, 2014.
    Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, it is hereby
    ORDERED that defendants shall file their response to plaintiff’s Notice of
    Supplemental Authority [Dkt. No. 125] on or before November 21, 2014.
    SO ORDERED.
    /s/____________________________
    PAUL L. FRIEDMAN
    DATE: November 6, 2014                         United States District Judge
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2006-1411

Judges: Judge Paul L. Friedman

Filed Date: 11/6/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2014