Wallace v. Pence ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • .i,,./w=/w.»,,.,,,»‘,...>,.».`` ».v,.,.…w_ . ,4 …, » », … ,
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    Jimmy Wallace,
    Plaintiff,
    Case: 1117-cv-00014
    Assigned To : Unassigned
    Assign. Date ; 1/4/2017
    Description: Pro Se Gen. Civi| (F Deck)
    V.
    Vice President-elect l\/like Pence,
    \/\/\/\/\_/\./\/\_/\,/\/
    Defendant.
    l\/IEMGRANDUl\/[ OPINION
    This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and
    application for leave to proceed informal pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is
    required to dismiss a complaint upon a determination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous
    28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
    Plaintiff is a resident of Washington, D.C., who has sued Vice President-elect l\/like
    Pence. The ten-page complaint consists of rambling statements about the recent presidential
    election and other random matters. Plaintiff seems to want to change the manner in which the
    vice president is selected, and he has “decided to challenge [Mr. Pence] to a debate[.]” Plaintiff
    proposes that if he Shows that he is “clearly more prepared to be vice president-by popular vote,”
    he "would ask that l\/lrs. Clinton have the office I’ve won.” Compl. at 2. prlaintiffis
    "unsuccessful, [he] would ask that emergency legislation to rename the vice president’s office
    ‘OLPUS,’ the officer named the Liaison, and l\/lrs. Clinton offered the position, based on the
    popular vote.” 
    Id. Plaintiff s
    “Dissertation,” 
    id., continues in
    this manner.
    \. » Wc.-,»,~»``~.»»m»_..m_W.~»,Mw»>c»x.~»¢w.»-.Wg~»-»M~wy.w»u .~, .
    Complaints premised on fantastic or delusional scenarios or supported wholly by
    allegations lacking “an arguable basis either in law or in fact” are subject to dismissal under
    § l9l5(e) as frivolous Neitzke v. Wl'lliams, 
    490 U.S. 319
    , 325 (1989); see Besi v. Kelly, 
    39 F.3d 328
    , 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (a court may dismiss as frivolous “essentially fictitious” claims)
    (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); Crl'safl v. H()Iland, 
    655 F.2d 1305
    , 1307-08
    (D.C. Cir, l981) (“A court may dismiss as frivolous complaints . . . postulating events and
    circumstances of a wholly fanciful kind.”). The instant complaint satisfies this standard;
    therefore, this case will be dismissed with prejudice A separate Order accompanies this
    l\/Iemorandum Opinion.
    /./’
    /ZJ//»- //A//f%
    p¢/ UnitedVStates District Judge
    Date: January 3__, 2017
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2017-0014

Judges: Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell

Filed Date: 1/4/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/5/2017