Bryant v. Colvin ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    LILLIE L. BRYANT,
    Plaintiff,
    v.
    Civil Action No. 16-2196 (TJK/DAR)
    ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of
    Social Security,
    Defendant.
    ORDER
    This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate
    Judge Deborah A. Robinson on November 18, 2019. See ECF No. 24 (“R&R”). The Report and
    Recommendation cautioned the parties that failing to file an objection within 14 days of receipt
    could lead to waiver of the right to further review of the issues addressed. R&R at 30. Neither
    party objected to the Report and Recommendation, and the deadline to do so has passed. LCvR
    72.3(b); Minute Order of November 27, 2019. And Defendant has affirmatively represented to
    the Court that it does not object. ECF No. 26.
    Lillie Bryant brought this action seeking to reverse the final decision of the
    Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for disability benefits. See ECF Nos.
    1, 5, 9, 24. She alleged that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) was not
    supported by substantial evidence and was erroneous as a matter of law. See ECF No. 9.
    Magistrate Judge Robinson, in a 30-page opinion, determined that the ALJ’s factual findings and
    legal conclusions about Bryant’s exertional capacity were amply supported by the record, but
    that those about Bryant’s respiratory condition, and her symptoms resulting from her hip and
    knee condition, were not supported by substantial evidence. R&R at 30. For those reasons,
    Magistrate Judge Robinson recommended that this Court remand the matter to the Social
    Security Administration for further proceedings. 
    Id. After independent
    consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the lack of any
    objection, the entire record, and the applicable law, the Court ORDERS that:
    1. The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety;
    2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal, ECF No. 9, is GRANTED;
    3. Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance, ECF No. 10, is DENIED; and
    4. This case is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further
    proceedings with the Report and Recommendation.
    SO ORDERED.
    /s/ Timothy J. Kelly
    TIMOTHY J. KELLY
    United States District Judge
    Date: December 5, 2019
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2016-2196

Judges: Judge Timothy J. Kelly

Filed Date: 12/5/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/6/2019