Banks v. Food and Drug Administration ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _]AN 3 1 2012
    Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy
    RAYNOLDO BANKS’ ) Courts for the District of Co|umbia
    Plaintiff, §
    v. § Civil Action N0. 2
    FOOD AND DRUG ADl\/IINISTRATION, §
    Defendant. §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    The plaintiff identifies the defendant as "FEDERAL DRUGE AMINSTRIONS," which
    presumably is a reference to the Food and Drug Administration. The court notes that plaintiff
    filed an identical complaint against this same defendant, and the complaint was dismissed
    without prejudice for its failure to comply with the basic notice pleading requirements of Rule
    S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Banks v. Food & DrugAdmin., N0. 12-0065
    (D.D.C. Jan. l7, 2012). The instant complaint is a repetitive lawsuit, and the court will dismiss it
    under 29 U.S.C. § l9l5(e)(2) as frivolous and malicious.
    An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.
    Aél/
    Un`` d S t?istrict Judge
    DATE;  /» /?9//
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2012-0161

Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg

Filed Date: 1/31/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014