All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court, District of Columbia |
2012-01 |
-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _]AN 3 1 2012 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy RAYNOLDO BANKS’ ) Courts for the District of Co|umbia Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action N0. 2 FOOD AND DRUG ADl\/IINISTRATION, § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff identifies the defendant as "FEDERAL DRUGE AMINSTRIONS," which presumably is a reference to the Food and Drug Administration. The court notes that plaintiff filed an identical complaint against this same defendant, and the complaint was dismissed without prejudice for its failure to comply with the basic notice pleading requirements of Rule S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Banks v. Food & DrugAdmin., N0. 12-0065 (D.D.C. Jan. l7, 2012). The instant complaint is a repetitive lawsuit, and the court will dismiss it under 29 U.S.C. § l9l5(e)(2) as frivolous and malicious. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. Aél/ Un`` d S t?istrict Judge DATE; /» /?9//
Document Info
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2012-0161
Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg
Filed Date: 1/31/2012
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/30/2014