Mohammed Bey v. Department of Human Services ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • FILED
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT 0F COLUMBIA _]AN 2 [] 2[]12
    C|erk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy
    Courts for the District of Co|umbia
    ABDUL AYAT MOHAMMED BEY, )
    )
    Plaintiff, )
    )
    v_ ) civil Acti@n No. 12 (){]8'7
    )
    DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., )
    )
    Defendants. )
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiff s application to proceed in
    forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The Court will grant the application, and dismiss the
    complaint.
    The Court has reviewed plaintiff s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by
    pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted
    by lawyers. See Haz``nes v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 5l9, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however,
    must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz``sch, 
    656 F. Supp. 237
    , 239
    (D.D.C. 1987). Rule S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint
    contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, a
    short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand
    for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum
    standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to
    prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the
    doctrine ofresjudz``cata applies. Brown v. Calz``j"arzo, 
    75 F.R.D. 497
    , 498 (D.D.C. l977).
    Plaintiff s complaint rambles and touches on several topics, from public assistance
    (which he characterizes as a "ponzi scheme"), to welfare reform, kidnap victims, identification
    requirements for voters, the prosecution of the late Senator Ted Stevens, and the presidential
    election. lt is difficult not only to discern a viable claim within this Court’s jurisdiction, but also
    to identify a clear statement showing plaintiff s entitlement to the relief he seeks. Accordingly,
    the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice. An Order consistent with this
    way
    DATE: IZA‘  k Unit Sta J/iiE/ge?
    Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2012-0087

Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg

Filed Date: 1/20/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014