Bryan v. Carter ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • F£LED
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA SEP 2 8 2012
    c\en<, u.s. oasmcr & Bankruptcy
    ) courts for the Dlstrict ot Golulnb|a
    Errol George Bryan, Jr., )
    )
    Plaintiff, )
    )
    v. ) Civil Action No.
    )
    Vance Carter, et al., )
    )
    Defendants. )
    )
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed
    in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiff s application and dismiss the complaint for lack
    of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. l2(h)(3) (requiring dismissal of a case when
    jurisdiction is found wanting).
    Plaintiff sues two Consulates of the Jamaican Embassy for monetary damages totaling
    $70 million. From what the Court can discern from the complaint’s allegations and unexplained
    attachments, plaintiff is an immigration and Customs Enforcement detainee at the LaSalle
    Detention Facility in Trout, Louisiana. He also claims to be "a Sovereign of the State of
    Delaware" who was subjected to an unlawful arrest. Compl. at 4. Plaintiff alleges that
    defendants, in their official capacities as representatives of Jamaica, have subjected him, a
    Jamaican national, to intentional infliction of emotional distress and human rights violations by
    refusing to visit him in prison and help him presumably with his court and/or deportation
    proceedings. See Compl. 111 2-7.
    The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ("FSIA") is the "sole basis for obtaining
    jurisdiction over a foreign state in our courts." Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping
    Corp., 
    488 U.S. 428
    , 434 (l989). "The FSIA provides generally that a foreign state is immune
    from the jurisdiction of the United States courts unless one of the exceptions listed in 28 U.S.C. §
    l605(a) applies." Roea’er v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 
    646 F.3d 56
    , 58 (D.C. Cir. 201 l) (citation
    and intemal quotation marks omitted). The complaint reveals no basis for finding a waiver of
    defendants’ immunity under the FSIA. Therefore, the Court will dismiss this action. A separate
    Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
    @%/ I,o/:£/
    DATE: September if , 2012 United States District Judge
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2012-1624

Judges: Judge Beryl A. Howell

Filed Date: 9/28/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014