Hickman v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                   FILED
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    MAY 1 4 2010
    Clerk, U.S. District & Bankru tc
    Courts for the District of COIU~bYa
    )
    Derian Douglas Hickman,                       )
    )
    Plaintiff,                             )
    )
    v.                             )
    )
    Civil Action No.
    10 0791
    Federal Reserve Board of Governors et al., )
    )
    Defendants.                            )
    )
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and
    application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the in forma pauperis
    application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading
    requirements of Rule 8(a) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
    Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch,
    
    656 F. Supp. 237
    , 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires
    complaints to contain "(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction
    [and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief."
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 
    129 S.Ct. 1937
    , 1950 (2009); Oralsky v. CIA, 
    355 F.3d 661
    , 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair
    notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate
    defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 
    75 F.R.D. 497
    ,498 (D.D.C. 1977).
    Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues the Federal Reserve. In the one-paragraph
    complaint, plaintiff alleges only that the defendants are "withholding [his] employment and bank
    ownership information[,] causing confusion to voters Governor of a state and employment as
    Federal Reserve Banking Board of Governors." He seeks an unspecified "amount due and
    documents" that he does not identify. Because the complaint fails to provide any notice of a
    claim, it will be dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
    ~'!~ j !/~/~
    United States District Judge
    Date: May   -ll, 2010
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2010-0791

Judges: Judge Ellen S. Huvelle

Filed Date: 5/14/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014