Trevino v. Texas Vital Statistics ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FILED
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA                                           MAY 262011
    ,.,!!~ u.s. District & Bankruptcy
    VU... III   for the DIstrict of Columbia
    )
    Flordelisa I. Trevino,                          )
    )
    Petitioner,                             )
    )
    v.                              )               Civil Action No.
    )
    Texas Vital Statistics, DSHS,                   )
    )
    Respondent.                             )
    )
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This matter is before the Court on review of the petition, brought pro se, and application
    to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the case will be dismissed for
    lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring the court to dismiss an
    action "at any time" it determines that subject matter jurisdiction is wanting).
    The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth
    generally at 
    28 U.S.C. §§ 1331
     and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available
    only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the
    amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least
    plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).
    Petitioner, a resident of Olongapo City, Philippines, has filed a "Petition to Amend
    Certificate of Death as Likewise Motion to Have a Copy of Modified True-Certified Copy of the
    Death Certificate." She seeks to compel such relief from a Texas agency. The federal courts
    may compel federal officials to act under certain circumstances. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1361
    . Such
    authority does not extend to state officials or agencies. Petitioner's recourse lies, if at all, in the
    Texas state court system. Because the petition presents neither a federal question nor a basis for
    diversity jurisdiction, the case will be dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this
    Memorandum Opinion.
    United States District Judge
    DATE: May!::J.-, 2011
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2011-0976

Judges: Judge Ellen S. Huvelle

Filed Date: 5/26/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014