Moore v. Federal Bureau of Investigation ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    PERCY EDWARD MOORE,
    Plaintiff,                                    ORDER
    v.                                                          10-cv-580-bbc
    FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
    BUREAU OF PRISON,
    CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,
    EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT,
    U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and
    EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS Criminal Division,
    Defendants.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    In an order dated October 6, 2010, I assessed plaintiff an initial partial payment of
    the filing fee in the amount of $11.38 and gave him until October 28, 2010 in which to
    submit the payment. Now plaintiff has submitted a letter dated October 19, 2010, in which
    he says he submitted his payment on October 8, 2010, and has not heard from the court
    about the status of his case. A review of this court’s financial records indicate that plaintiff’s
    initial partial payment has not yet been received. Therefore, I will construe plaintiff’s letter
    1
    as a motion for an extension of time to pay the initial partial filing fee.
    In his motion, plaintiff says that he submitted a “BP 199 Request” for disbursement
    of the initial partial payment to the court. However, the most recent payment from plaintiff
    was $2.20 received on October 7, 2010 and applied towards the outstanding debt he owes
    in case 06-C-697-C. Because it appears that plaintiff has begun the process of having the
    initial partial fee disbursed to the court or is waiting for the institution finance office to
    process his request for disbursement, I will allow plaintiff an extension of time until
    November 23, 2010 in which to pay the $11.38 initial partial filing fee.
    One further matter requires comment. In his letter plaintiff advises that 20% of his
    income is presently being withheld for previous litigation and states that the fee for filing
    “the lawsuit in progress should be added onto the balance of the old one so plaintiff is not
    paying 40% of his wages” towards civil filing fees. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act,
    an inmate who files a lawsuit in federal court under the in forma pauperis statute must pay
    the statutory filing fee, first by making an initial partial payment and then by sending the
    remainder of the fee to the court in installments of 20% of the preceding month’s income
    in accordance with 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (b)(2). If the prisoner then files additional complaints
    or appeals, the amount owed increases as well. Newlin v. Helman, 
    123 F.3d 429
    , 436 (7th
    Cir. 1997), rev'd on other grounds by Lee v. Clinton, 
    209 F.3d 1025
     (7th Cir. 2000) and
    Walker v. O'Brien, 
    216 F.3d 626
     (7th Cir. 2000) (fees for filing more than one lawsuit or
    2
    appeal accumulate).
    In plaintiff’s case, when he filed his complaint in case no. 06-C-697-C and made the
    initial partial payment, he became obligated to pay 20%of his income to reduce the balance
    due on the $350 filing fee. Then when plaintiff filed his two subsequent appeals in case no.
    06-C-697-C, he became obligated to pay 60% of his monthly income for the $350 filing fee
    and the two $455 appeal filing fees. Court records reflect that plaintiff has an outstanding
    balance in case 06-C-697-C of $851.63. Therefore, if plaintiff chooses to pursue his present
    case and pays the $11.38 initial partial filing fee, he will be obligated under the provisions
    of 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (b)(2) to pay 80% of his monthly income towards the remaining filing
    fee owed for this case and for the filing and appeal fees owed from his 2006 action. Because
    this court is bound by the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. I have no
    discretion to modify the method in which the filing fees are collected.
    However, plaintiff has a choice about this case. If by November 23, 2010, this court
    has not received plaintiff’s initial partial filing fee, I will assume he is no longer interested in
    pursuing this action and I will dismiss this case without prejudice. In that instance, plaintiff
    will not owe a filing fee. If plaintiff chooses to submit the $11.38 initial partial fee, his
    complaint will be taken under advisement for screening and he will be obligated to pay the
    remainder of the filing fee in accordance with 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (b)(2). If plaintiff chooses
    to pursue this case, he should show a copy of this order to prison officials to insure that they
    3
    are aware they should send plaintiff’s initial partial payment to this court.
    ORDER
    IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Percy Moore’s motion for an extension of time is
    GRANTED and the deadline within which plaintiff is to pay the $11.38 initial partial
    payment of the $350 fee for filing this case is extended to November 23, 2010. If, by
    November 23, 2010, plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial payment he will be held to have
    withdrawn this action voluntarily. In that event, the clerk of court is directed to close the
    file without prejudice to plaintiff’s filing his case at a later date.
    Entered this 3d day of November, 2010.
    BY THE COURT:
    /s/
    BARBARA B. CRABB
    District Judge
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2011-1067

Judges: Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

Filed Date: 11/3/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014