Deming v. Department of Corrections ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • FILED
    UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT CoURT jUL 3 0 2013
    FoR THE DIsrRiCr oF CoLUMBIA €lefk, 118 Dls!ricr & Bankrumcy
    Courts for the Dlstrict of Columbia
    Joshua Dean Deming, )
    )
    Plaintiff, )
    )
    v. ) Civil Action No. 18-1489 (UNA)
    )
    )
    Department of Corrections et al., )
    )
    Defendants. )
    MEl\/IORANDUM OPINION
    This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff``s pro se complaint and
    application for leave to proceed in forma pauperisl The Court will grant the in forma pauperis
    application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading
    requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
    Pro se litigants must comply with the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch,
    
    656 F. Supp. 237
    , 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule S(a) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires
    complaints to contain “(l) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction
    [and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.”
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcro_ft v. Iqbal, 
    556 U.S. 662
    , 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 
    355 F.3d 66l
    , 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair
    notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate
    defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies Brown v. Califano, 
    75 F.R.D. 497
    , 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions
    . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Forr Myer Constr. Corp., 
    71 F. Supp. 3d 163
    , 169 (D.D.C. 2014) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
    Plaintiff resides in Vancouver, Washington. He purports to sue state and federal
    defendants, but the cryptically worded complaint captioned “Tortured/Terrorist” fails to provide
    any notice of a claim and the basis of jurisdiction A separate order of dismissal accompanies
    this Memorandum Opinion.
    rla/195
    Date: July 47 ,ZOlS United gates DistrictJudge
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2018-1489

Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras

Filed Date: 7/30/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/31/2018