Sharp v. Dolan ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • FILED
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT jU\_ 3 0 2018
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , l `` *
    clerk u.b L)is!rlct & Bankruptcy
    Cnurts for the Dlstrict of Columbia
    DARYL SHARP, )
    )
    Plaintiff, )
    )
    v ) Civil Action No.: l:lS-cv-Ol4ll (UNA)
    )
    _ l
    Tll\/IOTHY DOLAN, )
    )
    Defendant. )
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This matter is before the Court on its initial review of the Plaintiff`` s pro se Complaint
    (“Compl.”) and Application for Leave to Proceed in_ forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Court will grant
    the Plaintiff" s Application for Leave to Proceed lFP and dismiss the case because the Complaint
    fails to meet the minimal pleading requirements of Rule S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil
    Procedure.
    Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz``sch,
    
    656 F. Supp. 237
    , 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires
    complaints to contain "(l) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction
    [and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.”
    Fed. R. Civ. P. S(a); see Ashcrofl v. ]qbal, 
    556 U.S. 662
    , 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 
    355 F.3d 661
    , 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair notice of
    the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate defense and
    determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies Brown v, Califano, 
    75 F.R.D. 497
    , 498
    (D.D.C. 1977).
    The Plaintiff brings an action against the Archbishop of New York, Cardinal Timothy
    Dolan, consisting of a set of wide-ranging grievances against the Catholic Church. Compl. at 3-6.
    The Plaintiff alleges that Catholic bishops are ". . . stealing from people, businesses [,] and the
    United States government,” 
    id. at 2,
    and are engaged in efforts to manipulate individuals “in this
    country and around the globe . , ." [a’. at 4. Further, the Plaintiff alleges that the Catholic Church
    is responsible for various “terror attacks.” Ia’. ln addition to “5()() trillion dollars” in damages, the
    Plaintiff prays that this Court assist in the mass conviction and incarceration of Catholic bishops.
    
    Id. at l,
    7.
    The Complaint, as pled, fails to provide any notice ofa claim or any basis of federal court
    jurisdiction Therefore, this case will be dismissed A separate Order accompanies this
    l\/lemorandum Opinion.
    //;2% 469
    Date: July 97 ,20l8 Unite States DistrictJudge
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2018-1411

Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras

Filed Date: 7/30/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/31/2018