Dibenedetto v. Iranian Ministry of Information and Security ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    )
    DAVID DEBENEDETTO, et al.,                  )
    )
    Plaintiffs,              )
    )
    v.                                  )       Case No. 1:16-cv-02429-TSC
    )
    THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN                )
    )
    AND                            )
    )
    THE IRANIAN MINISTRY                        )
    INFORMATION AND SECURITY                    )
    )
    Defendants.              )
    )
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Presently before the court is a motion for the entry of final judgment by Plaintiffs Melvin
    Rich, as representative of the Estate of Mabel Rich, and Dawn Webb, as representative of the
    Estate of Donald Webb. (ECF No. 43.) Plaintiffs are estate representatives of deceased relatives
    of American servicemembers killed in the 1983 bombing of the U.S. Marine Barracks in Beirut,
    Lebanon. Plaintiffs have sued the Islamic Republic of Iran and Iranian Ministry of Information
    and Security for their roles in the bombing under the state-sponsored terrorism exception in the
    Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1605A.
    This court previously entered extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law
    addressing Iran’s liability for Plaintiffs’ injuries—leaving only the quantum of damages
    unresolved. (See ECF No. 24.) The court-appointed Special Master subsequently filed reports
    reflecting his recommendations on Plaintiffs’ damages. (See ECF Nos. 29–35.) Plaintiff did not
    object to those findings.
    1
    The court previously entered a partial final judgment, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the
    Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 38.) In accordance with the Special Master’s
    damages recommendations, the court held the claims brought on behalf of the Estates of Mabel
    Rich and Donald Webb in abeyance pending the issuance of letters of administration for each
    Estate. (ECF No. at 37 at 7–8.) Letters of administration have since been issued for the Estates
    of Mabel Rich and Donald Webb and filed with the court. (ECF No. 43, Exs. A, B.)
    At Plaintiffs’ request, the court delayed issuing final judgment on Plaintiffs’ claims
    pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Opati v. Republic of Sudan, 
    140 S. Ct. 1601
     (2020).
    On May 20, 2020, Plaintiffs informed the court that the Opati decision confirms the availability
    of punitive damages to Plaintiffs. (ECF No. 45.)
    Based on the foregoing and in accordance with the court’s February 19, 2020
    Memorandum Opinion adopting the Special Master’s recommendations and finding that a ratio
    of 3.44 punitive damages to compensatory damages was appropriate, (ECF No. 37 at 7),
    Plaintiffs’ motion for the entry of default judgment as to the Estates of Mabel Rich and Donald
    Webb will be GRANTED. Furthermore, Plaintiffs shall be awarded $5,600,000.00 in
    compensatory damages and $19,264,000 in punitive damages, for a total award of $24,864,000
    to be distributed as follows:
    Plaintiff            Pain and          Solatium             Economic           Punitive
    Suffering
    Estate of Donald    --                 $600,000.00         --                  $2,064,000.00
    Webb
    Estate of Mabel     --                 $5,000,000.00       --                  $17,200,000.00
    Rich
    2
    The court will issue an order accordingly.
    Date: December 9, 2020
    Tanya S. Chutkan
    TANYA S. CHUTKAN
    United States District Judge
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2016-2429

Judges: Judge Tanya S. Chutkan

Filed Date: 12/9/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/10/2020