B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Twitter, Inc. ( 2024 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Plaintiff, Vv. Civil Action No. 20-621-GBW TWITTER INC., Defendant. B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No, 20-622-GBW GOOGLE LLC, Defendant. Stephen B. Brauerman, Ronald P. Golden II], BAYARD, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Mark Raskin, Robert Whitman, Michael DeVincenzo, Charles Wizenfeld, Andrea Pacelli, KING & WOOD MALLESONS LLP, New York, New York. Counsel for Plaintiff BE. Technology, LLC Jack B. Blumenfeld, Brian P. Egan, MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LIP, Wilmington, Delaware; Robert A. Van Nest, Eugene M. Paige, David J. Rosen, Taylor Reeves, KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP, San Francisco, California. Counsel for Defendant Google LLC Kelly E. Farnan, RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Sonal N. Mehta, Thomas G. Sprankling, WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP, Palo Alto, California; Nora Q.E. Passamaneck, WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP, Denver, Colorado. Counsel for Defendant Twitter, Inc. - MEMORANDUM OPINION A . * © GREGORY B. WILLIAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is the claim construction of one term in U.S. Patent No. 8,769,440 (the “°440 patent”). Plaintiff B.E. Technology, LLC asserts this patent against Defendants Twitter, Inc., and Google, LLC. . . The Court has considered the parties’ Joint Claim Construction Brief (“Br. [#]”) and the accompanying appendix (“Ex. [#]”). DJ. 94; DI. 95, The Court held a claim construction hearing on February 1, 2024 (“Tr. [#]”). I. LEGAL STANDARD “