Hartman v. State ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    WILLIAM HARTMAN,                        §
    §
    Defendant Below,                  §   No. 435, 2017
    Appellant,                        §
    §   Court Below—Superior Court
    v.                                §   of the State of Delaware
    §
    STATE OF DELAWARE,                      §   Cr. ID No. 0508007488 (S)
    §
    Plaintiff Below,                  §
    Appellee.                         §
    Submitted: November 14, 2017
    Decided: December 19, 2017
    Before VALIHURA,VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices.
    ORDER
    This 19th day of December 2017, after consideration of the appellant's opening
    brief, the State's motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, the Court concludes that
    the judgment below should be affirmed. The Superior Court did not err in dismissing
    the appellant's second motion for postconviction relief.           The motion was
    procedurally barred and failed to satisfy the pleading requirements of Superior Court
    Criminal Rule 61(d)(2).
    NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is
    GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
    BY THE COURT:
    /s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.
    Justice
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 435, 2017

Judges: Vaughn, J.

Filed Date: 12/19/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/20/2017