Rivkin v. Choupak ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    VLADIMIR RIVKIN,                           §
    §     No. 292, 2015
    Defendant and Counterclaim           §
    Plaintiff-Below, Appellant,          §
    §     Court Below: Court of Chancery
    §     of the State of Delaware
    v.                                   §     C.A. No. 7000-VCL
    §
    MICHAEL CHOUPAK, SERGUEI                   §
    SOFINSKI, and                              §
    INTERMEDIA.NET, INC.,                      §
    §
    Plaintiffs and Counterclaim          §
    Defendants-Below, Appellees.         §
    §
    Submitted: December 2, 2015
    Decided:   December 4, 2014
    Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND, VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and
    SEITZ, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc.
    ORDER
    This 4th day of December 2015, having considered this matter on the briefs
    filed by the parties, the Court has concluded that the final judgment of the Court of
    Chancery should be affirmed for the reasons stated in its March 21, 2013 bench
    ruling,1 its April 6, 2015 memorandum opinion,2 and its May 12, 2015 Order
    Addressing Award of Fees and Costs.3
    1
    Choupak v. Rivkin, C.A. No. 7000 (Del. Ch. Mar. 21, 2013).
    2
    Choupak v. Rivkin, 
    2015 WL 1589610
     (Del. Ch. Apr. 6, 2015).
    3
    Choupak v. Rivkin, 
    2015 WL 2233996
     (Del. Ch. May 12, 2015).
    NOW, THERFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the final judgment of the Court
    of Chancery is AFFIRMED and the Appellees’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees on
    Appeal is DENIED.
    BY THE COURT:
    /s/ Randy J. Holland
    Justice
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 292, 2015

Judges: Holland

Filed Date: 12/4/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/4/2015