Collins v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    JASON J. COLLINS,                      §
    §   No. 209, 2015
    Defendant Below-                 §
    Appellant,                       §
    §
    v.                               §   Court Below—Superior Court
    §   of the State of Delaware
    STATE OF DELAWARE,                     §
    §   Cr. 
    ID. No. 0904002027
           Plaintiff Below-                 §
    Appellee.                        §
    Submitted: November 12, 2015
    Decided: January 6, 2016
    Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND, and SEITZ, Justices.
    ORDER
    This 6th day of January 2016, upon consideration of the notice to show
    cause and the response and reply thereto, it appears to the Court that:
    (1)    The appellant, Jason Collins, filed this appeal from the Superior
    Court’s order denying his motion for correction of sentence. Collins argued below
    and on appeal that he is entitled to more credit time against the Level V portion of
    his sixth violation of probation sentence. While the appeal was pending, Collins
    completed the Level V portion of his sentence and was released from custody. The
    Clerk of the Court issued a notice to Collins to show cause why the appeal should
    be dismissed because the issue on appeal is now moot.
    (2)     Collins filed a response arguing that the issue of his entitlement to
    Level V credit time is not moot because he is still serving Level I probation, and he
    might violate his probation again and potentially be subject to more Level V
    incarceration. The State asserts that the issue of Level V credit time is moot.
    (3)     After careful consideration, the Court concludes that Collins’ release
    from Level V custody has rendered his request for Level V credit time moot.1 Any
    decision on Collins’ request for credit time would amount to an impermissible
    advisory opinion and would be a waste of scarce judicial resources.2 If Collins
    should violate his probation for a seventh time, he can raise the issue of his
    entitlement to Level V credit with the Superior Court before any future VOP
    sentencing.
    NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is hereby
    DISMISSED as moot.
    BY THE COURT:
    /s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.
    Chief Justice
    1
    Ewell v. State, 
    2011 WL 1716455
    (Del. May 5, 2011).
    2
    Sannini v. Casscells, 
    401 A.2d 927
    , 930 (Del. 1979).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 209, 2015

Judges: Strine

Filed Date: 1/6/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/8/2016