Matter of Collins ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    IN THE MATTER OF THE                     §
    PETITION OF JASON COLLINS                § No. 491, 2017
    FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION                §
    Submitted: January 8, 2018
    Decided:   February 20, 2018
    Before STRINE, Chief Justice; SEITZ and TRAYNOR, Justices.
    ORDER
    This 20th day of February 2018, upon consideration of Jason Collins’ petition
    for a writ of prohibition, his response to the notice to show cause, and the State’s
    response, it appears to the Court that:
    (1)    On November 27, 2017, Collins filed a petition asking this Court to
    issue a writ of prohibition preventing the Superior Court from applying money
    posted for Collins’ bail to his outstanding restitution obligation. The petition arises
    from Collins’ violations of probation (“VOP”) after August 20, 2009 convictions for
    Obtaining a Controlled Substance and Forgery in the Second Degree (Criminal ID
    No. 0904002027) and a February 24, 2015 conviction for Identity Theft (Criminal
    ID No. 1407019673). In Criminal ID No. 0904002027, Collins was sentenced to
    four years of Level V incarceration, suspended for decreasing levels of supervision,
    and ordered to pay $1,403.00 in restitution. In Criminal ID No. 1407019673, Collins
    was originally sentenced to three years of Level V incarceration, suspended for
    decreasing levels of supervision, and ordered to pay $5,293.00 in restitution. On
    April 10, 2017, after his seventh VOP in Criminal ID No. 0904002027 and his first
    VOP in Criminal ID No. 1407019673, Collins was sentenced to three years and
    eighteen days of Level V incarceration, suspended for decreasing levels of
    supervision. The restitution terms remained in effect.
    (2)     In August 2017, Collins was charged with another VOP after new
    criminal charges were filed against him. The October 2017 VOP hearing was
    continued at the request of the defense. On October 20, 2017, Collins’ counsel filed
    a motion for bail reduction. The motion sought reduction of the $5,751.09 cash bail
    (forfeit if posted) to $500.00 cash bail (forfeit if posted). On October 26, 2017, the
    Superior Court reduced the bail to $2,500.00 cash only “payable to restitution owed
    the Court.”1
    (3)     On November 27, 2017, Collins filed a pro se petition for a writ of
    prohibition in this Court objecting to the form of bail as security for fines and
    restitution, instead of his appearance in court. On December 4, 2017, the Superior
    Court modified Collins’ bail in Criminal ID No. 0904002027 to $552.00 cash only
    and in Criminal ID No. 1407019673 to $1,948.00 cash only. The Superior Court
    removed the condition that any posted bail be applied to Collins’ costs, fines, and
    restitution obligation. The Senior Court Clerk then issued a notice directing Collins
    1
    State v. Collins, Criminal ID Nos. 0904002027 and 1407019673 (Del. Super. Ct. October 26,
    2017) (order reducing bail, attached as Exhibit F to the State’s Response to Answer to Notice to
    Show Cause).
    2
    to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed as moot in light of the
    December 4, 2017 modification of bail. In his response to the notice to show cause,
    Collins objected that the bail is cash only and requested that it be changed to secured.
    The State argued that Collins is not entitled to a writ of prohibition. The bail was
    posted on February 6, 2018.
    (4)    Collins’ petition is moot. A writ of prohibition is the legal equivalent
    of the equitable remedy of injunction and may be issued to prevent a trial court from
    exceeding the limits of its jurisdiction.2 Collins’ writ of prohibition was based on
    the Superior Court making his cash only bail payable to restitution. The Superior
    Court modified Collins’ bail to remove the restitution condition, and the bail has
    been posted. Collins’ petition is therefore moot. The petition is also subject to
    dismissal because Collins is represented by counsel in the Superior Court
    proceedings and is not authorized to file a pro se petition directly related to
    proceedings in which he is represented by counsel.3
    NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
    prohibition is DISMISSED as moot.
    BY THE COURT:
    /s/ Gary F. Traynor
    Justice
    2
    In re Hovey, 
    545 A.2d 626
    , 628 (Del.1988).
    3
    In re Schoolfield, 
    1998 WL 280359
    , at *1 (Del. May 14, 1998); In re Haskins, 
    551 A.2d 65
    , 66-
    67 (Del. 1988).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 491, 2017

Judges: Traynor J.

Filed Date: 2/20/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/21/2018