Vandyke v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •             IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    ALEX VANDYKE,1                              §
    §
    Petitioner Below-                     §   No. 327, 2018
    Appellant,                            §
    §
    v.                                    §   Court Below—Family Court
    §   of the State of Delaware
    STATE OF DELAWARE,                          §
    §   Cr. ID K1712006829
    Respondent Below-                     §
    Appellee.                             §
    Submitted: August 1, 2018
    Decided: August 3, 2018
    Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.
    ORDER
    Upon consideration of the notice to show cause, the appellant’s response, and
    the State’s reply, it appears to the Court that:
    (1)     On June 25, 2018, the Court received the appellant Alex Vandyke’s
    notice of appeal from the Family Court’s order, dated May 22, 2018 and docketed
    May 23, 2018, accepting an order of a Family Court Commissioner requiring, among
    other things, that Vandyke register as a Tier II sex offender. Under Supreme Court
    Rule 6(a)(i), a timely notice of appeal should have been filed by June 22, 2018,
    which was thirty days from docketing of the Family Court’s order.
    1
    The Court previously assigned a pseudonym to the juvenile appellant.
    (2)    The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Vandyke to show
    cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Vandyke, through his
    counsel, filed a response to the notice to show on July 12, 2018. Counsel states that
    she incorrectly calculated the appeal deadline by relying upon the Family Court’s
    date of mailing the order, which is reflected on the order as May 24, 2018. Counsel
    requests a remand to the Family Court so that the Family Court may reissue its order.
    (3)    The State filed a reply to Vandyke’s response. The State does not
    object to counsel’s request for a remand to allow the Family Court to vacate its May
    22, 2018 order and to reissue it to allow Vandyke the opportunity to file a timely
    notice of appeal.
    (4)   We agree that the proper course of action is to remand this matter to the
    Family Court. Upon remand, the Family Court should vacate its May 22, 2018 order
    and reissue it in order to permit Vandyke the opportunity to file a timely appeal.
    NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the matter is
    REMANDED to the Family Court for further action in accordance with this order.
    Jurisdiction is not retained.
    BY THE COURT:
    /s/ Karen L. Valihura
    Justice
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 327, 2018

Judges: Valihura J.

Filed Date: 8/3/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024