Ullrich v. Navy Federal Credit Union ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    JO-ANNE F. ULLRICH,        §
    §                  No. 539, 2015
    Defendant Below,       §
    Appellant,             §                  Court Below—Superior Court
    §                  of the State of Delaware
    v.                     §
    §                  C.A. No. N13C-11-118
    NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, §
    §
    Plaintiff Below,       §
    Appellee.              §
    Submitted: June 27, 2016
    Decided:   July 18, 2016
    ORDER
    This 18th day of July 2016, it appears to the Court that:
    (1)    This appeal is from the Superior Court’s entry of judgment against the
    appellant, Jo-Anne Ullrich, in a breach of contract action brought by the appellee,
    Navy Federal Credit Union. Ullrich’s opening brief was due to be filed by April
    22, 2016. When Ullrich did not file the brief, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a brief
    delinquency notice, dated April 27, 2016, advising Ullrich that the brief must be
    filed within seven days. Ullrich did not respond to the brief delinquency notice
    and did not file the opening brief.
    (2)    On May 5, 2016, the Clerk issued a notice, by certified mail, directing
    Ullrich to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to file the
    opening brief. The notice to show cause directed Ullrich to respond within ten
    days and advised her that if she did not respond, dismissal of the appeal would be
    deemed to be unopposed.
    (3)    On May 23, 2016, Ullrich responded to the notice to show cause and
    asked for more time to file the opening brief. By letter dated May 23, 2016, the
    Clerk advised Ullrich that the Court would hold the notice to show cause in
    abeyance pending receipt of her opening brief on or before June 24, 2016. Ullrich
    was informed that if the brief was not filed by June 24, 2016, the appeal would be
    dismissed without further notice and as unopposed.
    (4)    Ullrich has filed nothing further in this case and has not filed the
    opening brief. Under these circumstances, dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be
    unopposed.
    NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 29(b)
    and 3(b)(2), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
    BY THE COURT:
    /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.
    Justice
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 539, 2015

Judges: Seitz J.

Filed Date: 7/18/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/19/2016