Adoni Health Institute v. Delaware Board of Nursing ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    ADONI HEALTH INSTITUTE,                   §
    §      No. 470, 2018
    Appellant Below,                    §
    Appellant/Cross-Appellee,           §
    §      Court Below: Superior Court
    v.                                  §      of the State of Delaware
    §
    DELAWARE BOARD OF                         §      C.A. No. N17A-10-003-JAP
    NURSING,                                  §
    §
    Appellee Below,                     §
    Appellee/Cross-Appellant.           §
    Submitted: April 10, 2019
    Decided:   April 11, 2019
    Corrected: April 29, 2019
    Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN and SEITZ, Justices.
    ORDER
    (1)    This appeal and cross-appeal involves two different Superior Court
    opinions, each of which reviewed a separate order of the Delaware Board of Nursing
    (the “Board”) withdrawing the approved nursing program status of the appellant and
    cross-appellee, the Adoni Health Institute (“Adoni”).
    (2)    In its first opinion (the “July 2016 Opinion”), the Superior Court
    reversed the Board’s order dated July 8, 2015, holding that the Board had
    erroneously found certain deficiencies that formed the basis for the Board’s decision
    to withdraw Adoni’s approved nursing program status.1 The Superior Court also
    held that the Board had not erred in finding one deficiency—that Adoni had
    misstated the length of its curriculum—but that it was the role of the Board to decide
    in the first instance whether that one deficiency was by itself sufficient to justify
    withdrawing Adoni’s approved nursing program status. Accordingly, the Superior
    Court remanded the case for the Board to make that determination.
    (3)    On remand, the Board found that Adoni’s misstatement of the length of
    its curriculum was sufficient to justify withdrawing the school’s approved nursing
    program status, and the Board withdrew that status in an order dated September 13,
    2017.2 Adoni appealed from that order to the Superior Court.
    (4)    On August 9, 2018 (the “August 2018 Opinion”), the Superior Court
    affirmed the Board’s September 13, 2017 order.3
    (5)    In this appeal and cross-appeal, Adoni appeals from the Superior
    Court’s August 2018 Opinion, and the Board cross-appeals from the Superior
    Court’s July 2016 Opinion.
    1
    Leads Sch. of Tech. Practical Nursing Program v. Del. Bd. of Nursing, C.A. N15A-08-002 JAP,
    slip op. at 12–13 (Del. Super. Ct. July 29, 2016). Adoni was formerly known as the “Leads School
    of Technology Practical Nursing Program.”
    2
    App. to Opening Br. at A-352–75 (Opinion and Order Withdrawing Approved Nursing Program
    Status (Sept. 13, 2017)).
    3
    Adoni Health Inst. v. Del. Bd. of Nursing, 
    2018 WL 3815047
     (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 9, 2018)
    2
    (6)    As to Adoni’s appeal, we affirm the Superior Court’s judgment on the
    basis of the August 2018 Opinion affirming the Board’s order dated September 13,
    2017.
    (7)    As to the Board’s cross-appeal, we find it unnecessary to address the
    Board’s contentions because our affirmance of the August 2018 Opinion will affirm
    the Board’s withdrawal of Adoni’s approved nursing program status anyway.4
    NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
    Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
    BY THE COURT:
    /s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.
    Chief Justice
    4
    Technically, if we addressed the cross-appeal and reversed the Superior Court’s July 2016
    Opinion, that would have the result of affirming the Board’s earlier July 8, 2015 decision. The
    problem for the Board, however, is two-fold. First, it has not convinced us that there is any material
    distinction in real-world terms between affirming the August 2018 Opinion and thus the Board’s
    withdrawal of Adoni’s approved nursing program status in its September 13, 2017 order, and
    instead issuing further rulings that would revive the Board’s earlier withdrawal order. Second, the
    Board’s cross-appeal fails to address all the bases on which the Superior Court based its remand
    in 2016; as a result, the Superior Court’s other grounds for remand would stand. For these reasons,
    we view it improvident and wasteful to weigh into legal issues that are immaterial and, for the
    second reason we have noted, seemingly moot.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 470, 2018

Judges: Strine C.J.

Filed Date: 4/29/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/29/2019