The Roofers, Inc. d/b/a Tri-State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    THE ROOFERS, INC., d/b/a                 §
    TRI-STATE THE ROOFERS,                   §
    §     No. 205, 2014
    Plaintiff-Below,                   §
    Appellant,                         §     Court Below: Superior Court of
    §     the State of Delaware in and for
    v.                                 §     New Castle County
    §
    DELAWARE DEPARTMENT                      §     C. A. No. N09C-11-063
    OF LABOR,                                §
    §
    Defendant-Below,                   §
    Appellee.                          §
    Submitted: November 19, 2014
    Decided: November 24, 2014
    Before STRINE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and VAUGHN, Justices.
    ORDER
    This 24th day of November 2014, upon consideration of the parties’ briefs
    and the record in this case, it appears to the Court that:
    The appellant raises as its central argument on appeal a proposition it did not
    fairly raise below. At best, the appellant can point to a single reference to that
    issue in a lengthy oral argument before the Superior Court. Its briefs to the
    Superior Court addressing sovereign immunity do not make the argument the
    appellant now attempts to make. Therefore, the issue has not been properly raised
    below and may not be raised on appeal under Rule 8.1 Nor is it in the interest of
    justice to allow a litigant who made an extremely unusual request for attorneys’
    fees, who should have anticipated a sovereign immunity defense, and who failed to
    present all of its arguments fairly below, to appeal the denial of that request. Based
    on the arguments that were fairly presented below, we find that the Superior Court
    made no error of law in denying the appellant’s application for attorneys’ fees, and
    we affirm on the basis of the Superior Court’s opinion of March 25, 2014.2
    NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
    Court is AFFIRMED.
    BY THE COURT:
    /s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.
    Chief Justice
    1
    Supr. Ct. R. 8 (“Only questions fairly presented to the trial court may be presented for review;
    provided, however, that when the interests of justice so require, the Court may consider and
    determine any question not so presented.”).
    2
    Roofers, Inc. v. Del. Dep’t of Labor, 
    2014 WL 1228911
     (Del. Super. Mar. 25, 2014).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 205, 2014

Judges: Strine

Filed Date: 11/24/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/26/2014