Perkins v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    LEON K. PERKINS,                                  §
    §   No. 648, 2014
    Defendant Below,                         §
    Appellant,                               §   Court Below: Superior Court
    §   of the State of Delaware in and
    v.                                       §   for New Castle County
    §
    STATE OF DELAWARE,                                §
    §
    Plaintiff Below,                         §   Cr. ID No. 0212008942
    Appellee.                                §
    Submitted: December 3, 2014
    Decided:   January 13, 2015
    Before STRINE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and VALIHURA, Justices.
    ORDER
    This 13th day of January 2015, upon consideration of the notice to
    show cause and the appellant’s response, it appears to the Court that:
    (1)     In 2005, the appellant, Leon K. Perkins, was convicted of
    Murder in the First Degree and related weapon offenses and was sentenced
    to mandatory life imprisonment plus sixteen years. On direct appeal, this
    Court affirmed Perkins’ convictions and sentence.1               In 2008, the Court
    1
    Perkins v. State, 
    920 A.2d 391
     (Del. 2007).
    affirmed the denial of Perkins’ motion for postconviction relief under
    Superior Court Criminal Rule 61.2
    (2)    Perkins has appealed the Superior Court’s November 5, 2014
    order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. By notice dated
    November 24, 2014, the Clerk directed that Perkins show cause under
    Supreme Court Rule 29(b) why the appeal should not be dismissed for this
    Court’s lack of jurisdiction to entertain an interlocutory appeal in a criminal
    matter.3
    (3)    In his December 3, 2014 response to the notice to show cause,
    Perkins states that he is entitled to the appointment of counsel to pursue
    further postconviction remedies. Perkins argues that, under the Delaware
    Constitution, this Court has jurisdiction to determine all appeals from the
    Superior Court in criminal cases, including his appeal from the Superior
    Court’s November 5, 2014 order denying his motion for appointment of
    counsel.
    (4)    Perkins is mistaken. Under the Delaware Constitution only a
    final judgment may be reviewed by the Court in a criminal case.4 In this
    2
    State v. Perkins, 
    2008 WL 2406231
     (Del. Super. June 11, 2008), aff'd, 
    2008 WL 5191831
     (Del. Dec. 11, 2008).
    3
    See Del. Supr. Ct. R. 29(b) (governing involuntary dismissal upon notice of the Court).
    4
    Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(1)(b); State v. Cooley, 
    430 A.2d 789
    , 791 (Del. 1981).
    2
    case, the Superior Court’s November 5, 2014 order denying Perkins’ motion
    for appointment of counsel is an interlocutory order.5 The denial of Perkins’
    motion is not appealable as a collateral order before the entry of a final order
    on a motion for postconviction relief.6
    NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule
    29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
    BY THE COURT:
    /s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.
    Chief Justice
    5
    Accord Lopez v. State, 
    2014 WL 3586494
     (Del. July 21, 2014); Harris v. State, 
    2013 WL 4858990
     (Del. Sept. 10, 2013); Brown v. State, 
    2012 WL 4466314
     (Del. Sept. 26,
    2012) (dismissing appeals from Superior Court orders denying appointment of counsel as
    impermissible criminal interlocutory appeals).
    6
    See St. Louis v. State, 
    2012 WL 130877
     (Del. Jan. 17, 2012) (citing Robinson v. State,
    
    704 A.2d 269
    , 271 (Del. 1998)).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 648, 2014

Judges: Strine

Filed Date: 1/13/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/14/2015