Jeffrey Gou v. Taipei American School Foundation ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    JEFFREY GOU, an individual,                )
    )
    Plaintiff,             )
    )
    v.                                 )   C.A. No. 2021-0483-JRS
    )
    TAIPEI AMERICAN SCHOOL                     )
    FOUNDATION, a Delaware                     )
    corporation,                               )
    )
    Defendant.             )
    ORDER REGARDING
    DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL
    AND NOW, this 22nd day of December 2021, the Court having considered
    Defendant’s Motion to Compel (the “Motion”), and the response thereto,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
    1.        The Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The discovery
    at issue seeks relevant information and Plaintiff has not carried his burden to sustain
    an “overly burdensome” objection.1
    1
    See Meltzer v. CNET Networks, Inc., 
    2007 WL 2593065
    , at *2 (Del. Ch. Sept. 6, 2007)
    (observing that a plaintiff’s purpose in demanding inspection of book and records and
    seeking to compel compliance with an inspection demand is “unquestionably” relevant in
    a Section 220 proceeding); Prod. Res. Gp., L.L.C. v. NCT Gp., Inc., 
    863 A.2d 772
    , 802
    (Del. Ch. 2004) (noting that the “burden is on [the objecting party] to show why the
    requested information is improperly requested”); In re Oxbow Carbon LLC Unitholder
    Litig., 
    2017 WL 959396
    , at *3 (Del. Ch. Mar. 13, 2017) (“For an objecting party to carry
    its burden, the [unduly burdensome] objection must be specific [and] the party making it
    must explain why it applies on the facts of the case to the request being made. . . .”).
    1
    2.   Notwithstanding the foregoing, given the condensed time between now
    and trial, the parameters of the discovery request must be narrowed to allow time for
    the discovery to occur. Accordingly, Defendant shall narrow the search protocol to
    ten (10) specifically identified individuals to include, if desired, Randy Chen.
    Defendant shall deliver the revised search parameters to counsel for Plaintiff by
    close of business on December 23, 2021.
    3,   Plaintiff shall collect and review his potentially responsive text and
    other chat messages in accordance with Defendant’s revised protocol and shall
    produce his non-privileged responsive text and other chat messages by January 4,
    2022.
    /s/ Joseph R. Slights III
    Vice Chancellor
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C.A. No. 2021-0483-JRS

Judges: Slights V.C.

Filed Date: 12/22/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/23/2021