Nandine v. Darrach ( 1800 )

Per Curiam. Chief Justice Booth.

In this action there are three grounds. First, not due diligence. The Court think a demand of payment was necessary. Second, plaintiffs were bound to give notice, — reasonable notice, to be decided by you. Third, plaintiffs had received a part, which discharged the drawer. The Court consider this question to turn on the second point.

Verdict for defendant.