State v. Greene ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •            IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    STATE OF DELAWARE                             )
    )       ID No. 1302015290
    v.                                          )       In and for Kent County
    )
    JEMAL A. GREENE,                              )
    )
    Defendant.                     )
    O RDER
    On this 11th day of July, 2016, upon consideration of the Defendant’s Motion
    For Postconviction Relief, the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation and the
    record in this case, it appears that:
    1. The Defendant, Jemal A. Greene (“Greene”), pled guilty on July 21, 2014, to
    two counts of Possession of a Firearm by a Person Prohibited, 11 Del. C.
    §1448(a)(9).1 In exchange for Greene’s plea, the State entered a nolle prosequis on the
    remaining charges. The Court sentenced Greene, in accordance with the Plea
    Agreement, to eleven years incarceration suspended after six years, minimum
    mandatory, for probation.
    2. The Defendant did not appeal his conviction or sentence to the Delaware
    Supreme Court; instead he filed, pro se, the pending Motion For Postconviction Relief
    pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 61. In his motion the Defendant raises the
    following ground for relief: 1) ineffective assistance of counsel.
    3. The Court referred this motion to Superior Court Commissioner Andrea M.
    1
    Greene was a person prohibited, because he possessed the firearm while also possessing
    heroin, 11 Del. C. §1448(a)(9).
    State v. Greene
    ID No. 1302015290
    July 11, 2016
    Freud pursuant to 10 Del. C. §512(b) and Superior Court Criminal Rule 62 for
    proposed findings of facts and conclusions of law.
    4. The Commissioner has filed a Report and Recommendation concluding that
    the Motion For Postconviction Relief should be denied, because it is procedurally
    barred and completely meritless.
    5. The Defendant filed an Appeal from Commissioner’s Report and
    Recommendation. The response does not advance his Motion for Postconviction
    Relief in any substantive way.
    NOW, THEREFORE, after de novo review of the record in this action, and
    for reasons stated in the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation dated May 25,
    2016,
    IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation is
    adopted by the Court, and the Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief is denied
    as procedurally barred and meritless.
    /s/ Robert B. Young
    Judge
    RBY/lmc
    oc: Prothonotary
    cc: The Honorable Andrea M. Freud
    Jason C. Cohee, Esq.
    Adam D. Windett, Esq.
    Jemal Greene, JTVCC
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1302015290

Judges: Young J.

Filed Date: 7/11/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/11/2016