State of Delaware v. Coleman. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •        IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY
    STATE OF DELAWARE                    )
    )     RK13-03-0939-01
    v.                                  )     PFBPP PABPP
    )     RK13-03-0944-01, RK13-03-0979-01
    DEVON L. COLEMAN,                    )     Police Signal (F)
    (I.D. No.’s 1303004663 &             )     RK13-03-0945-01
    1303012706)                          )     Conspiracy 2nd Degree
    )     RK13-03-0980-01
    Defendant.               )     Reckless Endangering 2nd Degree
    Submitted: December 23, 2015
    Decided: December 23, 2015
    Upon Consideration of Defendant’s Motion For Postconviction Relief
    Pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 61
    DENIED
    Jason C. Cohee, Esq., Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, for the
    State of Delaware.
    Devin L. Coleman, Pro se.
    Young, J.
    State v. Coleman
    
    ID. No.’s 1303004663
    & 1303012706
    December 23, 2015
    ORDER
    Upon consideration of the Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief, the
    Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, it appears
    that:
    1. The defendant, Devin L. Coleman (“Coleman”), pled guilty on June 17,
    2014 to one count of Felony Disregarding a Police Officer’s Signal, 
    21 Del. C
    . §
    4103; one count of Reckless Endangering in the Second Degree, 
    11 Del. C
    . § 603;1
    one count of Possession of Firearm or Ammunition by a Person Prohibited,2 
    11 Del. C
    . § 1448; one count of Conspiracy in the Second Degree, 
    11 Del. C
    . § 512; and one
    additional count of Felony Disregarding a Police Officer’s Signal.3 In exchange for
    Coleman’s plea, the State entered a nolle prosequis on Coleman’s remaining charges.
    The State recommended a total of fifteen years incarceration suspended after serving
    eight years for probation. The Court sentenced Coleman according to the
    recommended sentence.
    2. Coleman filed, pro se, an appeal to the state Supreme Court on August 12,
    2014 which was dismissed by the Court as untimely.4 Next, on September 2, 2014
    Coleman filed in this Court a Motion for Correction of a Sentence Imposed in an
    1
    These two charges are in case ID No. 1303004663 and occurred in Smyrna, Delaware on
    March 6, 2013.
    2
    Coleman is a person prohibited as a result of prior felony convictions.
    3
    These three charges are from case ID No. 1303012706 and occurred in Dover, Delaware
    on March 15, 2013.
    4
    Coleman v. State, Del. Supr. No. 434, 2014, Ridgely, J. (Sept. 16, 2014).
    2
    State v. Coleman
    
    ID. No.’s 1303004663
    & 1303012706
    December 23, 2015
    Illegal Manner under Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(A). He filed a second motion
    under 35(A) for Correction of an Illegal Sentence on September 11, 2014. He filed
    a third such motion on September 12, 2014. All motions were denied by the Court on
    December 18, 2014.5 Coleman initially appealed to the Supreme Court and
    subsequently withdrew his appeal.6
    3. While these motions were pending, Coleman filed, pro se, an initial Motion
    for Postconviction Relief that “replaced” the motion filed on September 8, 2014, In
    his motion the Defendant raises the following grounds for relief: (1) involuntary plea
    agreement; (2) denial of right to self[-] representation; and (3) structural error.
    4. The Court referred this motion to Superior Court Commissioner Andrea M.
    Freud pursuant to 
    10 Del. C
    . § 512(b) and Superior Court Criminal Rule 62 for
    proposed findings of facts and conclusions of law.
    5. The Commissioner has filed a Report and Recommendation concluding that
    the Motion for Postconviction Relief should be denied, because it is procedurally
    barred by Rule 61(i)(3) for failure to demonstrate cause and prejudice and as
    completely meritless.
    6. On December 2, 2015, Defendant filed a letter with this Court requesting
    to appeal the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation.
    7. On December 23, 2015, a letter was sent to Defendant notifying him an
    appeal should have been filed in Superior Court on or before October 20, 2015.
    5
    State v. Coleman, ID No. 1303012706, Young, J. (Dec. 18, 2014)(ORDER).
    6
    Coleman v. State, Del. Supr. No. 716, 2014 (Jan. 28, 2015).
    3
    State v. Coleman
    
    ID. No.’s 1303004663
    & 1303012706
    December 23, 2015
    NOW, THEREFORE, after de novo review of the record in this action, and
    for reasons stated in the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation dated
    September 30, 2015,
    IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation is
    adopted by the Court, and the Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief is
    DENIED.
    /s/ Robert B. Young
    J.
    RBY/lmc
    oc: Prothonotary
    cc: The Honorable Andrea M. Freud
    Jason C. Cohee, Esq.
    Devin L. Coleman, Pro Se
    File
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1303004663 1303012706

Judges: Young

Filed Date: 12/23/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/4/2016