Cooper v. Delaware Department of Health and Social Services Division of Long Term Care Residents Protection ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • SUPERIOR COURT
    oFTHE
    STATE OF DEL.AWARE
    NEW CASTLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE
    500 NORTH KING STREET, SU|TE 104-00
    WlLMlNGTON, DE|_AWARE 19801-3733
    TELEPHONE (302) 255-0664
    R lCHARD R. COOCH
    REleENTJuDGE
    Caesar Kasarnba Cooper
    5580 Heritage Court Drive, Apt. 1C
    Wilmington, Delaware 19808
    Appellant, Pro se
    Karen M. Volker, Esquire
    Deputy Attorney General
    Department of`` Justice
    820 North French Street, 6th Floor
    Wilmington, Delaware 19801
    Attorney for Appellee
    Re: Caesar Kasamba Cooper v. I)elawarc Department of Hea|th
    and Social Services Division of Long Term Care Residents
    Protection
    C.A. No. N18A-09-005 RRC
    Submitted: October 24, 2018
    Decided: December 4, 2018
    On Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss. GRANTED.
    Dear Mr. Cooper and Ms. Volker:
    Appellee Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Long Term
    Care Residents Protection (“DHSS” and “DLTCRP” respectively) filed a Motion to
    Dismiss Appellant Caesar Kasamba Cooper’s Appeal of the Decision of the Hearing
    Officer on behalf of DLTCRP. Pursuant to 11 Del. C. § 8564(b), the finding of the
    hearing of``ficer is the final decision of DLTCRP, and is appealable on the record to
    the Superior Court. ' Under Superior Court Civil Rule 72(b), “[i]f no time is
    prescribed by statute, the notice of appeal shall be filed Within 15 days from entry of
    ' 11 Del. C. § 8564(b).
    the final judgment, order, or disposition from Which an appeal is permitted by laW.”2
    Section 8564 does not prescribe a deadline for filing an appeal. Thus, in this matter,
    Civil Rule 72(b) applies.3
    lt is Well established that the Court lacks jurisdiction to decide a direct appeal
    that is untimely, and jurisdictional defects cannot be Waived.4 There is no remedy
    for an untimely appeal, as the Court lacks jurisdiction.5 Under Superior Court Civil
    Rule 72(i), the Court has discretion to dismiss any appeal sua sponte, or on a motion
    to dismiss by any party.6 Among other reasons, “[d]ismissal may be ordered for
    untimely filing of an appeal....”7
    In this case, Appellant filed his appeal five days after the 15-day deadline. The
    hearing officer, on behalf of DLTCRP, rendered a final decision on August 31, 2018.
    Thus, Appellant Was required to file a notice of appeal on or before September 15,
    2018, or risk Waiving any right to further appeal. Appellant filed his appeal on
    September 20, 2018. Appellant’s appeal must be dismissed.
    Accordingly, Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    Vel'y truly yotu's,
    RRC
    cc: Prothonotary
    Department of Health and Social Services
    Division of Long Term Care Residents Protection
    2 Super. Ct. Civ. R. 72(b).
    3 Appellant Was advised that Civil Rule 72(b) applied to his matter under Section V of the
    hearing officer’s Written decision. See Final Decision of the Division of Long Term Care
    Residents Protection, Appellee’s Mot. to Dismiss, Ex. B, Trans. ID 62593786, at 11, § V.
    4 Eller v. State, 
    531 A.2d 951
    , 953 (Del. 1987).
    5 Eller, 
    531 A.2d at 951
    ; Irvin-Wright v. State, 
    2003 WL 2148100
    '4, at *3 (Del. Super. June 16,
    2003).
    6 Super. Ct. Civ. R. 72(i).
    7 
    Id.
                                

Document Info

Docket Number: N18A-09-005 RRC

Judges: Cooch R.J.

Filed Date: 12/4/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/4/2018