State v. Johnson ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •            IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    STATE OF DELAWARE                           :
    :   Case No: 1601016740
    :   In and For Kent County
    v.                                    :
    :
    QUAYSHAUN JOHNSON,                          :
    :
    Defendant.                     :
    O RDER
    Defendant Johnson has Moved to Suppress evidence obtained in an
    Administrative Search.
    Essentially, the parties agree that 11 Del. Code § 4321(d) and DOC Procedure
    7.19 control the resolution of this Motion. That is, did Officer Porter successfully
    navigate the requirements of the foregoing to justify his search of Room 106, where
    the critical evidence was found, as well as Defendant’s vehicle and Defendant.
    The findings of the hearing on this Motion established the following:
    (1) Officer Porter received information, from a person whom he knew to be a
    past proven, reliable informant, which indicated that “Q” (identified by Officer Porter
    as Defendant) had been seen by the informant to be in possession of heroin; was to
    be located at Room 106 of the Dover Inn; and was operating a green SUV. Officer
    Porter confirmed the accuracy of Defendant’s location and vehicle. Additionally,
    Officer Porter conducted substantial surveillance, providing further corroboration of
    the informant’s information.
    (2) Officer Porter, a probation officer, was aware that Defendant was a
    probationer at the time of the foregoing.
    (3) Given the reliability of the information received, and the source from which
    State v. Johnson
    Case No. 1601016740
    December 5, 2016
    it came, as well as his own observations, Officer Porter had a well informed telephone
    discussion with his Supervisor. As a result, a search was justified and authorized for
    Defendant’s person, his vehicle and Room 106.
    Based on the totality of all of the foregoing, all conforming to Probation and
    Parole Rule 7.19, 11 Del. Code § 4321(d), and relevant case law requirements, the
    searches here were valid. Defendant’s Motion, therefore, is DENIED.
    SO ORDERED this 5th day of December, 2016.
    /s/ Robert B. Young
    J.
    RBY/lmc
    oc: Prothonotary
    cc: D. Benjamin Snyder, Esquire
    Alexander W. Funk, Esquire
    Opinion Distribution
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1601016740

Judges: Young J.

Filed Date: 12/5/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/5/2016