JP Miorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Ryans ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, .
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, : ID No. 09L-06-078 NEP
    In and For Kent County
    PLAINTIFF,
    v.
    IRIS R. RYANS
    DEFENDANT.
    Subrnitted: March 23, 2018
    Decided: March 28, 2018
    ORDER
    Before the Court is Defendant Iris R. Ryans’s (hereinai°cer “Defendant”)
    Motion to Set Aside Judgment.
    The facts briefly are as follows. On June 22, 2009, Plaintiff filed a complaint
    against Defendant seeking foreclosure of Plaintiff’ s interest in 7 Ashby Lane, Dover,
    Delaware 19904. On July 8, 2009, a Sheriff’ s Return Was filed With this Court in
    Which Sheriff J im Higdon attested that a copy of Writ of summons Was personally
    served upon Defendant on July 7, 2009. Default Judgment Was entered in Plaintiff’ s
    favor on August 2, 2010 (hereinafcer the “Judgment”).
    Defendant’s only arguments here for Setting aside the Judgment are that she
    never received a summons, and that Mr. Higdon, the sheriff, “Was untrustworthy to
    sign a sherist return.”
    JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nationa/ Association v. lris R. Ryans
    09L-06-078 NEP
    March 28, 2018
    Under Superior Court Civil Rule 60, the Court shall set aside a judgment if
    the movant demonstrates that the judgment is void. Default judgments may be
    considered void Where proper service was never affected upon the defendant.l “In
    Delaware, a sherist return is “prima facie proof of proper service.”2 “Strong and
    convincing proof is required to rebut the presumption of its verity.”3 Here, Defendant
    has presented no proof or evidence Whatsoever to rebut the presumption of proper
    service. At the hearing held on March 23, 2018, With regards to this matter, Ms.
    Ryans made ad hominem attacks against Mr. Higdon, and repeated her claim that
    she never received a summons. The Court finds that Defendant Was properly served,
    and she puts forth no other grounds for setting aside the Judgment.
    WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s motion to set aside the
    judgment is DENIED.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    /s/ Noel Eason Primos
    Judge
    NEP/st
    Via File&ServeXpress & U.S. Maz``l
    oc. Prothonotary
    cc. Iris Ryans
    Daniel Conway, Esquire
    1Keith v. Melvin L. Joseph Const. Co., 
    451 A.2d 842
    , 845 (Del. Super. 1982).
    2 Alston v. Dipasquale, 
    2001 WL 34083824
    , at *l (Del. Super. Oct. 19, 2001).
    3 Cohen v. Brana'ywine Raceway Ass'n, 
    238 A.2d 320
    , 324 (Del. Super. 1968).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: K09L-06-078 NEP

Judges: Primos J.

Filed Date: 3/28/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/28/2018