State v. Daniels ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    STATE OF DELAWARE, )
    )
    Plaintiff, )
    )
    V )
    ) Cr. ID. No. 1404018370
    )
    JAMES DANIELS, )
    )
    Defendant.
    Submitted: October 14, 2016
    Decided: December 13, 2016
    Upon Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation on Defendant’s Motions for
    Postconviction Relief and Discovery and Inspection
    ADOPTED
    M
    This 13th day of December, 2016, the Court has considered the
    Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation, Defendant’s Motion for
    Postconviction Relief, Defendant’s Motion for Discovery and Inspection, and the
    relevant proceedings below.
    On February l, 2016, Defendant James Daniels filed this pro se motion for
    Postconviction relief. The motion Was referred to a Superior Court Comrnissioner
    in accordance With 10 Del. C. § 512(b) and Superior Court Criminal Rule 62 for
    proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. On May 12, 2016, Defendant
    filed the Motion for Discovery and Inspection While the Motion for Postconviction
    Relief Was pending. The Commissioner issued the Report and Recommendation
    on October 14, 2016. The Commissioner recommended that Defendant’s Motions
    for Postconviction Relief and Discovery and Inspection be denied.
    “Within ten days after filing of a Commissioner’s proposed Report and
    Recommendation . . . any party may serve and file Written objections.”1 Neither
    party has filed an objection to the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation.
    The Court holds that the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation
    dated October 14, 2016, should be adopted for the reasons set forth therein. The
    Commissioner’s findings are not clearly erroneous, are not contrary to laW, and are
    not an abuse of discretion.2
    THEREFORE, after careful and de novo review of the record in this action,
    the Court hereby adopts the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation in its
    entirety. Defendant’s Motions for Postconviction Relief and Discovery and
    Inspection are hereby DENIED.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    ary M. Johnston
    1 Super. ct. Cn'm. R. 62(a)(5)(ii).
    2 Super. ct. crim. R. 62(a)(4)(iv).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1404018370

Judges: Johnston J.

Filed Date: 12/13/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/14/2016