State v. Martin ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    STATE OF DELAWARE                         )
    )     ID No. 0808015453A
    v.                                      )     In and for Kent County
    )
    TYRONE J. MARTIN,                         )
    )
    Defendant.                  )
    Submitted: April 27, 2016
    Decided: June 28, 2016
    Upon Consideration of Defendant’s Second Motion For Postconviction Relief
    Pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 61
    DENIED
    ORDER
    On this 28th day of June, 2016, upon consideration of the Defendant’s Second
    Motion For Postconviction Relief, the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation
    and the record in this case, it appears that:
    1. The Defendant, Tyrone J. Martin (“Martin”), pled guilty on March 17, 2009,
    to one count of Trafficking in Cocaine 10 - 50 grams, 
    16 Del. C
    . §4753A and one
    count of Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony, 
    11 Del. C
    .
    §1447A. In exchange for Martin’s plea, the State entered nolle prosequis on the
    remaining charges and agreed to a pre-sentence investigation and to cap its
    recommended sentence at eight years incarceration. The Court sentenced Martin to a
    total of fifteen years incarceration, suspended after serving six years with credit for
    time served, followed by probation.
    State v. Martin
    ID No. 0808015453A
    June 28, 2016
    2. In September 2014, while on probation, Martin tested positive for
    Oxycodone and Opiate use and in October 2014, a search of Martin’s residence
    uncovered more than 400 bags of heroin, which resulted in Martin’s arrest on new
    criminal charges. A report was filed charging Martin with violating probation. The State
    ultimately dismissed the new criminal charges; however, Martin’s probation officer
    filed a supplemental violation report, alleging that Martin had tested positive for drug
    use on May 28, 2015 and July 9, 2015, and that he had committed a curfew violation
    on July 7, 2015.
    3. Martin’s counsel filed a motion to suppress the evidence that had been seized
    during the search in October 2014, and a hearing was held on August 12, 2015, which
    the Court denied the motion. The Court sentenced Martin to ten years and four months
    at Level V incarceration, suspended after four years, followed by probation.
    4. Next, the Defendant filed an appeal with the Supreme Court. Pending the
    appeal, Martin filed, pro se, a motion for correction of an illegal sentence, requesting
    a modification of his sentence. Then Defendant filed the pending Second Motion for
    Postconviction Relief pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 61, on December 15,
    2015 while his direct appeal was also still pending. On February 10, 2016, the Supreme
    Court denied Martin’s appeal. In his motion Martin raises two grounds for relief: 1)
    ineffective assistance of counsel; and 2) the defendant’s rights against unlawful
    searches and seizures were violated when probation searched his residence without
    following proper procedures of SOP 7.19 as set forth through DOC policies and
    procedures.
    5. The Court referred this motion to Superior Court Commissioner Andrea M.
    2
    State v. Martin
    ID No. 0808015453A
    June 28, 2016
    Freud pursuant to 
    10 Del. C
    . §512(b) and Superior Court Criminal Rule 62 for
    proposed findings of facts and conclusions of law.
    6. The Commissioner has filed a Report and Recommendation concluding that
    the Second Motion For Postconviction Relief should be denied, because it is
    procedurally barred and completely meritless.
    7. The Defendant filed a Motion to Amend Motion for Postconviction Relief
    and a Second Motion to Amend Motion for Postconviction Relief. The Motions to
    Amend were denied, because they were filed as untimely as the briefing schedule had
    been completed.      Further, the Commissioner had issued her Report and
    Recommendation prior to the Motions to Amend.
    NOW, THEREFORE, after de novo review of the record in this action, and
    for reasons stated in the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation dated March
    14, 2016,
    IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation is
    adopted by the Court, and the Defendant’s Second Motion for Postconviction Relief
    is DENIED.
    /s/ Robert B. Young
    J.
    RBY/lmc
    oc: Prothonotary
    cc: The Honorable Andrea M. Freud
    Kathleen A. Dickerson, Esq.
    Deborah L. Carey, Esq.
    Tyrone J. Martin, JTVCC
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 0808015453A

Judges: Young J.

Filed Date: 6/28/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/29/2016