State v. Sullivan ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    STATE OF DELAWARE )
    )
    V. )
    ) LD. No. 1808004521
    )
    PAUL C. SULLIVAN, )
    )
    Defendant. )
    ORDER
    AND NOW TO WIT, this 9" day of December 2019, upon consideration of
    Defendant Paul Sullivan’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Modification of Sentence, the
    sentence imposed upon Defendant, and the record in this case, it appears to the
    Court:
    l. On March 21, 2019, Defendant pleaded guilty to Assault First Degree
    (Class B Violent Felony).' After an appropriate colloquy, this Court addressed
    Defendant in open court pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 11(c)(1) and
    determined that he understood the nature of the charge to which the plea was offered,
    the mandatory minimum penalty provided by law and the maximum statutory
    penalties. Defendant fully acknowledged in open court the range of possible
    penalties for his crimes. The plea agreement, signed by both the State and
    ' Final Case Review: Pled Guilty. Limited PSI Ordered, State of Delaware v. Paul C. Sullivan,
    Crim. ID No. 1808004521, D.I. 11 (Mar. 21, 2019) [hereinafter “Final Case Review” ].
    * See Final Case Review.
    Defendant, indicated that Defendant understood “that he [was] subject to a 2 year
    minimum mandatory sentence on the Assault First Degree Charge [and that] [t]he
    State agree[d] to cap its Level 5 recommendation at three years.”? Defendant had
    previously participated in the Mental Health Court. Thus, this Court ordered a
    limited PSI and represented to Defendant that sentencing before the Court would
    take place on another date.
    2. Instead, on June 28, 2019, another judicial officer sentenced Defendant
    to twenty-five years at Level V, suspended after four years at Level V, for ten years
    at Level IV, suspended after six months at Level IV, for eighteen months at Level
    IlI.* In sum, he received four years of incarceration followed by transitioning levels
    of probation.
    3, On September 20, 2019, Defendant asked this Court to reduce his Level
    V sentence under Rule 35(b).° He seeks to have his Level V sentence reduced the
    minimum mandatory two years.® In support of his Motion, Defendant states several
    grounds for relief.’
    3 See 
    id. 4 Sentence:
    ASOP Order Signed By Judge Clarke-Streett, State of Delaware v. Paul C. Sullivan,
    Crim. ID No. 1808004521, D.I. 21 (June 28, 2019). The judicial officers conferred and agreed
    that the matter should have remained assigned to this Court.
    > Defendant’s Motion for Modification of Sentence, State of Delaware v. Paul C. Sullivan, Crim.
    ID No. 1808004521, D.I. 23 (Sep. 20, 2019) [hereinafter “Def.’s Mot.”]; Defendant’s Motion for
    Modification of Sentence, State of Delaware v. Paul C. Sullivan, Crim. ID No. 1808004521, D.L.
    24 (Sep. 25, 2019) [hereinafter “Def.’s Mot.”].
    ® See Def.’s Mot. at pages 2-3.
    7 See 
    id. at page
    2 (Defendant states the following grounds for relief: (1) “PTSD” — “Defendant
    2
    4, Under Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(b), the Court may reduce a
    sentence of imprisonment on a motion made within ninety days after the sentence is
    imposed.? “Rule 35(b) allows for a reduction of sentence without regard to the
    existence of a legal defect.”® Thus, relief under Rule 35(b) is within the sound
    discretion of the sentencing court.” Accordingly, a timely and non-repetitive Rule
    35(b) motion is “essentially a “plea for leniency.””!! Therefore, where Defendant's
    motion is not time barred and is non-repetitive, it is considered a plea for leniency.
    5. Had Defendant appeared before this Court as planned, the Court would
    have imposed the same sentence, except it would have followed the recommended
    cap of three years of Level V. Therefore, Defendant’s sentence is reduced to twenty-
    five years at Level V, suspended after three years, for ten years at Level IV,
    suspended after six months at Level IV, for eighteen months at Level IIl. All
    previous terms and conditions remain unchanged."
    has severe PTSD;” (2) “change” — “Defendant has displayed uncommon courage, conviction,
    and effort to change;” (3) “volunteer work” — Defendant does “volunteer work in the
    community;” and (4) “therapy and education” — “Defendant has dedicated over 1,000 hours to
    therapy and education to change.”).
    8 SUPER. CT. CRIM. R. 35(b).
    ° State y. Lewis, 
    797 A.2d 1198
    , 1201 (Del. 2002).
    10 Td.
    1 I. at 1202 (quoting United States v. Maynard, 
    485 F.2d 247
    , 248 (oth Cir. 1973)).
    12 Defendant is required to: (1) have no contact with Steven Sullivan; (2) undergo mental health
    evaluation and follow recommendation for counseling and treatment; (3) successfully complete
    anger management, counseling, treatment program, (4) be evaluated for substance abuse and
    follow any recommendations for counseling, testing or treatment deemed appropriate; (5)
    undergo TASC evaluation; (6) complete a Domestic Violence course, and take all medications as
    prescribed. Defendant is also required to pay restitution.
    3
    It IS SO ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Modification of Sentence 1S
    GRANTED, in part.
    oc: Prothonotary
    cc: Defendant
    Department of Justice
    Investigative Services
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1808004521

Judges: Medinilla J.

Filed Date: 12/9/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/9/2019