State v. Dale ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    STATE OF DELAWARE,
    Plaintiff,
    V. Cr. 
    ID. No. 1306017883
    ANTHONY L. DALE,
    \/\/\/\./\/\/\_/\_/\_/
    Defendant.
    Submitted: April 29, 2016
    Decided: June 15, 2016
    Upon Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation On
    Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Re1ief
    Should be Denied
    ADOPTED
    _ORDER
    This 15th day of June, 2016, the Court has considered the Commissioner’s
    Report and Recommendation, Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief, and
    the relevant proceedings be1ow.
    On Ju1y 31, 2014, Defendant Anthony L. Dale filed this pro se motion for
    postconviction re1ief. Subsequently, Defendant was assigned counsel ("Rule 61
    Counsel"). The motion was referred to a Superior Court Comrnissioner in
    accordance with 
    10 Del. C
    . § 512(b) and Superior Court Crimina1 Rule 62 for
    proposed findings of fact and conclusions of 1aw. On Decernber 7, 2015,
    Defendant filed an Amended Motion for Postconviction Relief. On March 31,
    20l6, the State filed a Response to Defendant’s Amended Motion for
    Postconviction Relief. On April l5, 2016, Defendant filed a Reply Brief in support
    of his Amended Motion for Postconviction Relief. The Commissioner issued the
    Report and Recommendation on April l9, 2016. The Commissioner recommended
    that Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief be denied.
    "Within ten days after filing of a Commissioner’s proposed findings of fact
    and recommendations . . . any party may serve and file written objections."l
    Neither party has filed an objection.
    The Court holds that the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation
    dated April l9, 2016, should be adopted for the reasons set forth therein. The
    Commissioner’s findings are not clearly erroneous, are not contrary to laW, and are
    not an abuse of discretion.z
    THEREFORE, after careful and de novo review of the record in this action,
    the Court hereby adopts the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation in its
    entirety. Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief is hereby DENIED.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    1 super. Cr. crim R. 62(@1)(5)(11).
    2 super. Cr. crim R. ez(a)(¢t)(iv).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1306017883

Judges: Johnston J.

Filed Date: 6/15/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/15/2016