State v. Jackson ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    STATE OF DELAWARE                      )
    )
    v.                           )     ID No. 2210001670
    )
    NEHEMIAH P. JACKSON                    )
    )
    Defendant.        )
    ORDER DENYING MOTON FOR APPOINTMENT
    OF POSTCONVICTION COUNSEL
    AND NOW TO WIT, this 7th day of August, 2024, the Court having duly
    considered Nehemiah P. Jackson’s (“Jackson”) Motion for Appointment of Counsel
    and the Record, IT APPEARS THAT:
    (1)   On September 22, 2023, Jackson pled guilty to one count of
    Manslaughter and one count of Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of
    a Felony (“PFDCF”).1 On October 3, 2023, the Court sentenced Jackson as follows:
    for Manslaughter, 12 years at Level V, suspended after 5 years at Level V for 3 years
    at Level IV, suspended after 6 months at Level IV for 18 months and Level III; and
    for PFDCF, 10 years at Level V, suspended after 5 years at Level V for 2 years at
    1
    D.I. 32.
    Level III.2 Jackson was sentenced to a total of 10 years of unsuspended Level V
    time.3
    (2)   Jackson did not file a direct appeal.
    (3)   On June 21, 2024, Jackson filed a pro se motion for postconviction
    relief,4 and a Motion for Appointment of Counsel.5
    (4)   Pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(e)(2):
    The judge shall appoint counsel for an indigent movant's
    first timely postconviction motion and request for
    appointment of counsel if the motion seeks to set aside: (i)
    a judgment of conviction after a trial that has been
    affirmed by final order upon direct appellate review and is
    for a crime designated as a class A, B, or C felony under 11
    Del. C. § 4205(b); (ii) a judgment of conviction after a trial
    that has been affirmed by final order upon direct appellate
    review and resulted in the imposition of a life sentence
    under 11 Del. C. § 4214; or (iii) a sentence of death.6
    (5)   Because Jackson pled guilty and did not file a direct appeal he fails to
    satisfy Rule 61(e)(2)(i).7
    2
    D.I. 36.
    3
    Id.
    4
    D.I. 37.
    5
    D.I. 38.
    6
    Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(e)(2).
    7
    Jackson does not meet the criteria set forth in Rule 61(e)(4) for the same reasons. See Super. Ct.
    Crim R. 61(e)(4) (“The judge may appoint counsel for any other first postconviction motion only
    if the judge determines that: (i) the motion is an indigent movant's first timely postconviction
    motion and request for appointment of counsel; (ii) the motion seeks to set aside a judgment of
    conviction after a trial that has been affirmed by final order upon direct appellate review; (iii) the
    motion sets forth a substantial claim that the movant received ineffective assistance of trial or
    appellate counsel; (iv) the motion sets forth a substantial claim that the movant is in custody in
    violation of the United States Constitution or the Delaware Constitution; (v) granting the motion
    2
    WHEREFORE, Jackson’s Motion for Appointment of Postconviction
    Counsel is DENIED.
    /s/ Jan R. Jurden
    Jan R. Jurden, President Judge
    Original to Prothonotary
    cc: Ipek Kurul, Esq., DAG
    Nehemiah Jackson
    would result in vacatur of the judgment of conviction for which the movant is in custody; and (vi)
    specific exceptional circumstances warrant the appointment of counsel.”) (emphasis added).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2210001670

Judges: Jurden P.J.

Filed Date: 8/7/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2024