Galante Romar Phillips v. State of Florida , 249 So. 3d 596 ( 2018 )

Supreme Court of Florida
____________
No. SC17-1150
____________
GALANTE ROMAR PHILLIPS,
Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
[July 19, 2018]
PER CURIAM.
This case is before the Court on appeal from an order granting in part and
denying in part a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction of first-degree murder
and a sentence of death under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851.1 We
hereby dismiss this appeal because the guilt phase issues were waived since they
were not briefed by Phillips, and the penalty phase issues were mooted by the new
penalty phase ordered by the trial court pursuant to Hurst v. State, 202 So. 3d 40(Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2161 (2017). Because there will be a new
1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.
penalty phase, it is inconsequential whether Phillips’s trial counsel was ineffective
for failing to raise the issue of intellectual disability at the previous penalty phase.
As the State argued, Phillips may raise the issue of intellectual disability at the trial
court prior to his new penalty phase proceedings. See Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d
211, 212 (Fla. 1992) (“A case is ‘moot’ when it presents no actual controversy or
when the issues have ceased to exist.” (citing Black’s Law Dictionary 1008 (6th ed.
1990))).
It is so ordered.
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA,
and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND,
IF FILED, DETERMINED.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Duval County,
Mallory D. Cooper, Judge - Case No. 162006CF015566AXXXMA
Frank Tassone of Tassone, Dreicer, & Hill, LLC, Jacksonville, Florida,
for Appellant
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer A. Donahue, Assistant Attorney
General, Tallahassee, Florida,
for Appellee
-2-