Barse v. Whaley , 94 Fla. 295 ( 1927 )


Menu:
  • This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed upon authority of Farrell v. Forest Inv. Co., 73 Fla. 191, 74 So.2d Rep. 216; Davidson v. Collier, 75 Fla. 783, 78 So.2d Rep. 983; Smith v. O'Brien, 75 Fla. 252, 78 So.2d Rep. 13; Travis v. Travis, 81 Fla. 309, 87 So.2d Rep. 762; Simpson v. First Nat. Bank of Pensacola, 74 Fla. 539, 77 So.2d Rep. 204; Burgess v. Wirt, 91 Fla. 425, 108 So.2d Rep. 169.

    Affirmed.

    ELLIS, C. J., AND STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur. *Page 296

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 114 So. 319, 94 Fla. 295

Judges: Brown, Ellis, Strum

Filed Date: 7/19/1927

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024