Miami Transit Company v. Hines , 148 Fla. 28 ( 1941 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

    Affirmed.

    Whitfield, Terrell, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., and Thomas, J., dissent. Chapman, J., not participating.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 3 So. 2d 724, 148 Fla. 28, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 824

Judges: Whitfield, Terrell, Buford, Adams, Brown, Thomas, Chapman

Filed Date: 7/29/1941

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/7/2024