Gregory v. State ( 1932 )

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See State v. Schoonover, 122 Wash. 562, 311 Pac. Rep. 756; Devitt v. People (People v. Wilson), 298 Ill. 257, 131 N.E. Rep. 609; Hoback v. United States, 284 Fed. Rep. 529; People v. Otis,235 N.Y. 421, 139 N.E. Rep. 562; Re v. Commonwealth, 230 Ky. 656, 20 S.W. Rep. 2d 484, 66 A.L.R. 1297; Ellis v. Commonwealth, 186 Ky. 494, 217 S.W. Rep. 368, 11 A.L.R. 1030; Burgess v. State (Md.), 155 Atl. Rep. 153, 75 A.L.R. 1471; 36 C. J. 747, as to larceny of contraband intoxicating liquor.

Affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, TERRELL AND BROWN, J.J., concur.

ELLIS AND DAVIS, J.J., concur specially.