Purvis v. Malloy Ex Rel. Tiller , 129 Fla. 191 ( 1937 )

I concur in the opinion and judgment with one exception relating to that part of the opinion which quotes the holding of the Pennsylvania Court. I think the third paragraph of that holding while perhaps pertinent to the facts of the case, can hardly be accepted as a general principle of law applicable to all cases. Each case must be considered with reference to the facts of the particular case. See Chamberlain v. Chamberlain,115 Fla. 21, 155 So. 136.