Virgil Lee Harris v. State of Florida , 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 186 ( 2015 )

Supreme Court of Florida
____________
No. SC14-258
____________
VIRGIL LEE HARRIS,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[April 2, 2015]
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District
Court of Appeal in State v. Harris, 129 So. 3d 1166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014), based on
express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further
consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted.
Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON,
and PERRY, JJ., concur.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Direct
Conflict of Decisions
Third District - Case No. 3D12-1996
(Miami-Dade County)
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and James A. Moody, Assistant Public
Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, Florida,
for Petitioner
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Richard L. Polin,
Bureau Chief, and Jill Diane Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, Florida,
for Respondent
-2-