Lainesse v. St. Clairs Cafeteria , 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3790 ( 1966 )

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 27, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for writ of certiorari and the petition for attorney’s fees are both denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.