Baker Protective Services, Inc. v. Mayo , 330 So. 2d 460 ( 1976 )

PER CURIAM.

Our careful consideration and analysis of the petition, the record, briefs and arguments of counsel sustain the view that the findings of the Commission are supported by competent substantial evidence and that, in entering its orders, Respondent Commission met the essential requirements of law.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is

DENIED.

OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.