Rushing v. Jacksonville Electric Authority , 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4045 ( 1977 )

PER CURIAM.

This case is before the Court under its conflict certiorari jurisdiction as provided by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and Fla.App.Rule 4.5 c. (6).

After hearing argument, we are of the opinion that the writ of certiorari heretofore granted in this cause, Fla.App., 324 So.2d 727 should now be discharged. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari is discharged.

OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.