Downs v. State , 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 657 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We have for review a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal, in which the court certified as a question of great public importance the same question certified by that court and answered in Burgess v. State, 831 So.2d 137 (Fla.2002). See Downs v. State, 768 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, quash the decision of the Second District, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Burgess.

    It is so ordered.

    ANSTEAD, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. CANTERO, J., dissents with an opinion, in which WELLS and BELL, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. SC00-2382

Citation Numbers: 853 So. 2d 396, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 657, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1405, 2003 WL 21981986

Judges: Anstead, Bell, Cantero, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Wells

Filed Date: 8/21/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024