David Miller, Jr. v. Julie L. Jones, etc. , 237 So. 3d 921 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •           Supreme Court of Florida
    ____________
    No. SC17-1211
    ____________
    DAVID MILLER, JR.,
    Petitioner,
    vs.
    JULIE L. JONES, etc.,
    Respondent.
    [January 31, 2018]
    PER CURIAM.
    David Miller, Jr., petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus seeking
    relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida,
    
    136 S. Ct. 616
     (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 
    202 So. 3d 40
     (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 
    137 S. Ct. 2161
     (2017). This Court has
    jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(9), Fla. Const.
    This Court stayed Miller’s case pending the disposition of Hitchcock v.
    State, 
    226 So. 3d 216
     (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 
    138 S. Ct. 513
     (2017). After this
    Court decided Hitchcock, Miller responded to this Court’s order to show cause
    arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.
    After reviewing Miller’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the
    State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Miller is not entitled to relief. Miller
    was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of
    seven to five, and Miller’s sentence of death became final in 2001. Miller v. State,
    
    770 So. 2d 1144
    , 1146 (Fla. 2000). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to
    Miller’s sentence. See Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at 217. Accordingly, we deny
    Miller’s petition.
    The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Miller, we
    caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so
    ordered.
    LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
    PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.
    LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.
    PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.
    I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock
    v. State, 
    226 So. 3d 216
     (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 
    138 S. Ct. 513
     (2017), is now
    final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting
    opinion in Hitchcock.
    An Original Proceeding – Habeas Corpus, Duval County,
    Case No. 161997CF006680AXXXMA
    -2-
    Christopher J. Anderson of Law Office of Christopher J. Anderson, Neptune
    Beach, Florida; and Billy H. Nolas, Chief, Capital Habeas Unit, Office of the
    Federal Public Defender, Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida,
    for Petitioner
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer A. Donahue, Assistant Attorney
    General, Tallahassee, Florida,
    for Respondent
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SC17-1211

Citation Numbers: 237 So. 3d 921

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 1/31/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024