MV Senior Management, LLC v. Redus Florida Housing, LLC , 265 So. 3d 738 ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •           FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    STATE OF FLORIDA
    _____________________________
    No. 1D17-4688
    _____________________________
    MV SENIOR MANAGEMENT, LLC,
    Appellant,
    v.
    REDUS FLORIDA HOUSING, LLC,
    Appellee.
    _____________________________
    On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
    Adrian G. Soud, Judge.
    March 20, 2019
    PER CURIAM.
    Upon review of the record and Appellant’s response to our
    order to show cause on jurisdiction, we find that the claim
    remaining pending below is interrelated with the claim on
    appeal, depriving us of jurisdiction. The order on appeal disposes
    of only count one of Appellee’s two-count third-party complaint
    against Appellant. Count one seeks contractual and common-law
    indemnity. Count two, still pending below and stayed pending
    this appeal, alleges breach of contract for Appellant’s failure to
    obtain insurance and indemnify Appellee. Both counts relate to
    the same underlying tort claim against Appellee, and both counts
    arise out of the same management agreement between the two
    parties to this appeal. This is a classic case of a piecemeal appeal.
    See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 
    304 So. 2d 97
    , 99-100 (Fla.
    1974) (holding that piecemeal review is disfavored and the lower
    tribunal should rule on all interrelated claims to avoid the
    potential need for successive appeals).
    This appeal does not fall within the scope of Florida Rule of
    Appellate Procedure 9.110(k), allowing immediate appeals of
    certain partial final judgments. That rule requires that the cause
    of action disposed of in the order appealed not be “interdependent
    with other pleaded claims,” and that is not the case here. Id.; see
    also Fla. Farm Bureau Gen. Ins. Co. v. Peacock’s Excavating
    Serv., Inc., 
    186 So. 3d 6
    , 11 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (dismissing
    appeal for lack of jurisdiction where claim still pending below
    involved same facts and contracts as the order appealed).
    DISMISSED.
    ROWE, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
    _____________________________
    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
    _____________________________
    R. Daniel Noey and Wesley D. Fina of Schutt, Schmidt & Noey,
    Jacksonville, for Appellant.
    W. Douglas Childs and Brian M. Pederson of Childs, Hester &
    Love, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee Redus Florida Housing,
    LLC.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-4688

Citation Numbers: 265 So. 3d 738

Filed Date: 3/20/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/20/2019