Walker v. State , 257 So. 3d 1175 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •       Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed October 31, 2018.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D18-1996
    Lower Tribunal No. 18-8225
    ________________
    Anthony S. Walker,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    Gregg Stephen Tekerman,
    Appellee.
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M.
    Rodriguez, Judge.
    Gary Barcus (Pembroke Pines), for appellant.
    MKRS, LAW P.L., and Sergio R. Casiano, Jr., for appellee.
    Before SUAREZ, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
    PER CURIAM.
    Upon consideration, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss this appeal for
    lack of jurisdiction, as the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss
    for failure to state a cause of action is a nonfinal, nonappealable order. See Fla. R.
    App. P. 9.130(a)(3); Gomez v. S & I Props., LLC, 
    220 So. 3d 539
    (Fla. 3d DCA
    2017); Eagle Arts Acad., Inc. v. Tri-City Elec. Co., 
    211 So. 3d 1083
    (Fla. 3d DCA
    2017); Fineman v. Greenberg, 
    575 So. 2d 1310
    (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
    Alternatively, appellant requests that we treat this as a petition for writ of
    certiorari. Certiorari is ordinarily unavailable to review an order denying a motion
    to dismiss. See Lantana Ins., Ltd. v. Thornton, 
    118 So. 3d 250
    , 251 (Fla. 3d DCA
    2013) and cases cited; Cuneo v. Conseco Servs., LLC, 
    899 So. 2d 1139
    (Fla. 3d
    DCA 2005); Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Sinclair, 
    808 So. 2d 231
    , 232 (Fla.
    3d DCA 2001) (holding: “The mere expense and inconvenience of litigation does
    not constitute harm sufficient to permit certiorari review, even if the order departs
    from the essential requirements of the law”). Further, the petition filed in the
    instant case fails to establish the prerequisite to invoking this court’s certiorari
    jurisdiction—an irreparable harm that cannot be corrected on postjudgment appeal.
    See Bd. of Trs. Of Internal Improvement Fund v. Am. Educ. Enters., 
    99 So. 3d 450
    , 454-55 (Fla. 2012). We are therefore without jurisdiction to consider this on
    certiorari review.
    Appeal dismissed.
    2
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1996

Citation Numbers: 257 So. 3d 1175

Filed Date: 10/31/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2018