STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CENTRAL THERAPY CENTER, INC., A/A/O ALFREDO TORRES ( 2021 )

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed June 23, 2021.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-0069
Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-0298 AP, 07-5682 SP
________________
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,
Appellant,
vs.
Central Therapy Center Inc., a/a/o Alfredo Torres,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Gloria
Gonzalez-Meyer, Judge.
Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, and Nancy W. Gregoire (Ft.
Lauderdale); Kirwan Spellacy Danner Watkins & Brownstein, P.A., and
Christopher L. Kirwan (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellant.
Corredor & Husseini, P.A., and Maria E. Corredor; David B. Pakula,
P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals a final
judgment entered in favor of Central Therapy Center, Inc. in the amount of
$6,704.00 plus interest for medical services rendered to Alfredo
Torres. Torres was an omnibus insured under a personal injury protection
(“PIP”) policy of insurance issued by State Farm to Maria Herrera. Torres
allegedly was in an automobile accident and assigned his PIP benefits under
Herrera’s policy to Central Therapy.
The final judgement was entered after the lower court granted in
Central Therapy’s favor its (1) motion for summary judgment arguing the
services Central Therapy rendered to Torres were reasonable, related, and
medically necessary; (2) motion for summary judgment regarding Torres’s
alleged unreasonable refusal to attend an independent medical examination;
and (3) motion for final summary judgment on the issue of fraud.
Our review is de novo. See Diodato v. Islamorada Asset Mgmt., Inc.,
138 So. 3d 513, 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). Because, based on our review of
the record, there are genuine issues of material fact, we are compelled to
reverse the final judgment and the orders granting summary judgment in
favor of Central Therapy on the issues of reasonable, related, and medically
necessary; Torres’s alleged unreasonable refusal to attend an independent
medical examination; and on the issues surrounding the alleged fraud. See
2
MacKendree & Co., P.A. v. Pedro Gallinar & Assocs., P.A., 979 So. 2d 973,
976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“While we do not pass on the merits of the parties’
opposing viewpoints, we conclude that material facts are in direct conflict,
thereby precluding summary judgment.”).
Reversed and remanded.
3