WILLIAM L. RAMOS, JR. v. MICHAEL HALPERN, etc. ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •       Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed February 9, 2022.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D21-201
    Lower Tribunal No. 19-34890
    ________________
    William L. Ramos, Jr.,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    Michael Halpern, etc.,
    Appellee.
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice
    Butchko, Judge.
    Law Office of Hugh J. Morgan, and Hugh J. Morgan; Steven M.
    Goldsmith, P.A., and Steven M. Goldsmith (Boca Raton), for appellant.
    Waldman Barnett, P.L., and Glen H. Waldman and Marlon Weiss, for
    appellee.
    Before EMAS, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ.
    EMAS, J.
    In related case 3D20-738, William L. Ramos, Jr. appealed the trial
    court’s final judgment dismissing, with prejudice, his four-count amended
    complaint for failing to post a bond in accordance with the terms of a
    revocable trust agreement that formed the subject of the litigation. We held
    that the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint with prejudice, and
    further erred in dismissing Count Four at all. We reversed the final judgment,
    reinstated Count Four, and directed that the dismissal of Counts One, Two
    and Three be without prejudice. We remanded the cause to the trial court for
    further proceedings consistent with that opinion. See Ramos v. Halpern, 46
    Fla. L. Weekly D2582 (Fla. 3d DCA December 1, 2021).
    While that appeal was pending in this court, the trial court adjudicated
    Halpern’s trailing motion for attorney’s fees and costs, premised upon his
    status as the prevailing party.    The trial court granted the motion and
    awarded attorney’s fees and costs to Halpern, resulting in the order on
    appeal in the instant case.
    Appellee Halpern properly and commendably concedes that, based
    upon our reversal of the trial court’s final judgment of dismissal, we must
    likewise reverse the order awarding attorney’s fees and costs. See Dooley
    & Mack Constructors, Inc., v. Buildtec Const. Grp., Inc., 
    983 So. 2d 1243
    2
    (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (citing Marty v. Bainter, 
    727 So. 2d 1124
     (Fla. 1st DCA
    1999)).
    We reverse the order awarding attorney’s fees and costs and remand
    this cause for further proceedings.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-0201

Filed Date: 2/9/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/9/2022